By Jonah Goldberg
Thursday, November 27, 2014
On Tuesday, the day after it was announced that Officer
Darren Wilson would not be charged in the slaying of Michael Brown, President
Obama for a second time called for calm. His statement was measured, careful
and responsible. He condemned violence and looting while acknowledging the
legitimate concerns animating the protestors. He wasn’t all that moving or
eloquent, but this might have been one of those times when swinging for the
rhetorical fences wasn’t what the moment needed.
One theme he hit repeatedly, and correctly, was that the
passions of many protestors are rooted in something very real. The
“frustrations that we’ve seen are not just about a particular incident,” Obama
said. “They have deep roots in many communities of color who have a sense that
our laws are not always being enforced uniformly or fairly.”
There’s no doubt that is true. As John McWhorter writes
in Time magazine, “The key element in the Brown–Wilson encounter was not any
specific action either man took — it was the preset hostility to the cops that
Brown apparently harbored.” Officer Wilson made a legitimate request of Brown.
Brown, in turn, saw no legitimacy in it and behaved recklessly.
In a community where cops are feared, resented, or
reviled, it’s almost inevitable that bad things will happen when cops try to do
their job, even if they do everything by the book. Moreover, to simply say that
the resentment of the police is unwarranted does nothing to solve the problem.
People forget that for a brief moment in August, the protests turned peaceful
and law-abiding when Missouri Highway Patrol Captain Ron Johnson, an
African-American from Ferguson with credibility in the neighborhood, was put in
charge of policing the protests.
Eventually, thanks in large part to an influx of
professional agitators, rabble-rousers, and opportunists — attracted to
television cameras like ambulance chasers to a bus accident — the protests got
out of hand again. But that moment was instructive.
Now, if you’ve been following the news lately — and by
lately, I mean the last several years, or even decades — none of this is
particularly shocking. Friction between police departments and minority
communities has been part of the national conversation on race (that liberals
insist hasn’t been going on) for as long as I can remember. The New York Times
has been regularly covering that beat for at least half a century. It’s a major
theme of movies and music. It’s a huge profit center for Al Sharpton, who
doesn’t lack for influence or microphones.
And while I have no respect whatsoever for Sharpton, I do
think the issue is real. President Obama is right about that.
But what’s left out of the narrative that drives so much
of the national conversation are the other real experiences of other Americans.
On MSNBC, particularly last August, the discussion of Michael Brown — much like
Trayvon Martin before him — has been almost entirely abstract. Brown wasn’t a
person who allegedly robbed a convenience store. He was a stand-in for racial
injustice. That’s what was so powerful about Brown’s (probably mythological)
“hands up” gesture.
The outrage that followed when the convenience store
robbery video was released and details from the grand jury were leaked was at
least in part fury at having the narrative muddied. No one likes to see fresh
gospel fact-checked. No one wants to hear that their martyr was in fact no
angel. And, in the case of Wilson, no one wants to see their demon humanized.
My point here isn’t to “blame the victim” — or even
assign blame in this tragic nationalized game of Rashomon. It’s simply to note
that there is a huge chasm between the way the talking heads and politicians
talk about America and the way Americans actually live their lives. Most people
aren’t lawyers or academic theorizers. The people we interact with on a daily
basis aren’t abstractions, they’re normal human beings, which means they’re a
mixed bag. In the nightly shouting match, for instance, we’re told immigration
is all This or all That. But in our lives we see the good and the bad.
The national media — on the right and left — has an
insatiable desire for storylines so clear-cut they might as well be allegories.
The problem is that life isn’t allegorical. It’s messy.
No comments:
Post a Comment