By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
"Congressional investigators are fuming over
revelations that the Internal Revenue Service has lost a trove of emails to and
from a central figure in the agency's tea party controversy."
That's the opening sentence of the Associated Press story
on the IRS's claim that it lost an unknown number of emails over two years
relating to the agency's alleged targeting of political groups hostile to the
president.
But note how the AP casts the story: The investigators --
Republican lawmakers -- are outraged.
Is it really so hard to imagine that if this were a
Republican administration, the story wouldn't be the frustration of partisan
critics of the president? It would be all about that administration's behavior.
With the exception of National Journal's Ron Fournier, who called for a special
prosecutor to bypass the White House's "stonewalling," and former CBS
correspondent Sharyl Attkisson, it's hard to find a non-conservative journalist
who thinks this is a big deal.
Let's back up for a moment. In 2013, IRS official Lois
Lerner planted a question from an audience member at an American Bar
Association meeting. She used her answer to apologize for -- and favorably spin
-- the agency's actions, and then later claimed that the apology came as an
unprompted response to a question.
Lerner laid the blame for the inappropriate targeting of
tea party and other groups to a few low-level bureaucrats in Cincinnati. That
was a lie. Senior officials in the IRS knew and helped to coordinate the
effort. She said she only heard about the problem when tea party groups
protested. The targeting, in fact, had already been under internal and external
investigation.
In short, Lerner worked hard at denying her agency's
tactics on applications for nonprofit status from groups deemed to be hostile
to the president's agenda. According to IRS officials' congressional testimony,
agents were told to "be on the lookout" for groups that
"criticized how the government is being run." Lerner even joked to
colleagues that she should get a job at Obama's activist group Organizing for
Action.
President Obama insists he didn't know about any of this
until he was briefed on it the way he's briefed on so many issues: from news
reports. Nevertheless, we've since learned that White House officials were aware
earlier.
Lerner, who was forced to resign, took the Fifth
Amendment rather than clear the air.
In the June issue of Commentary, Noah Rothman notes that
the mainstream media initially treated the IRS story as a very big deal. ABC's
Terry Moran dubbed it a "truly Nixonian abuse of power by the Obama
administration." But as Rothman notes, the media were just as quick to buy
the story that this was a minor bureaucratic screw-up being whipped up into
what the president called yet another "phony scandal."
More recently, Obama proclaimed there was not even a
"smidgen" of corruption at the IRS, despite the fact his
administration's own investigations are still underway. Obama's assurance
seemed good enough for most of the media.
This is one of the great public relations turnaround
stories of all time. Liberal groups successfully spun the incident as a
well-intentioned mistake by a government agency trying to deal with a deluge of
new applications from right-wing crazies let loose by the Supreme Court's Citizens
United decision. The "real" story was -- again -- Republican
overreach.
Never mind that there was no evidence for such an
"uptick" in applications -- Lerner's word. Indeed, evidence suggests
that Lerner went looking for that evidence as an excuse for abuses she had
already undertaken.
So now the IRS claims that a computer crash has
irrevocably erased pertinent emails (an excuse I will remember when I am
audited). National Review's John Fund reports that the IRS manual says backups
must exist. If emails -- which exist on servers, clouds and elsewhere -- can be
destroyed this way, someone should tell the NSA that there's a cheaper way to
encrypt data.
The storied City News Bureau of Chicago famously lived by
the motto "If your mother tells you she loves you, check it out." The
bureau closed down several years ago. Perhaps that kind of skepticism died with
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment