By Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, February 04, 2014
Some supporters of President Obama may be worried about
how he and the Democrats are going to fare politically, as the problems of
ObamaCare continue to escalate, and it looks like the Republicans have a chance
to win a majority in the Senate.
But Democrats may not need to worry so much. Republicans
may once again come to the rescue of the Democrats, by discrediting themselves
and snatching defeat from the very jaws of victory.
The latest bright idea among Republicans inside the
Beltway is a new version of amnesty that is virtually certain to lose votes
among the Republican base and is unlikely to gain many votes among the
Hispanics that the Republican leadership is courting.
One of the enduring political mysteries is how the
Republicans can be so successful in winning governorships and control of state
legislatures, while failing to make much headway in Washington. Maybe there are
just too many clever GOP consultants inside the Beltway.
When it comes to national elections, just what principles
do the Republicans stand for? It is hard to think of any, other than their
hoping to win elections by converting themselves into Democrats lite. But
voters who want what the Democrats offer can vote for the real thing, rather
than Johnny-come-lately imitations.
Listening to discussions of immigration laws and
proposals to reform them is like listening to something out of "Alice in
Wonderland."
Immigration laws are the only laws that are discussed in
terms of how to help people who break them. One of the big problems that those
who are pushing "comprehensive immigration reform" want solved is how
to help people who came here illegally and are now "living in the
shadows" as a result.
What about embezzlers or burglars who are "living in
the shadows" in fear that someone will discover their crimes? Why not
"reform" the laws against embezzlement or burglary, so that such
people can also come out of the shadows?
Almost everyone seems to think that we need to solve the
problem of the children of illegal immigrants, because these children are here
"through no fault of their own." Do people who say that have any idea
how many millions of children are living in dire poverty in India, Africa or
other places "through no fault of their own," and would be better off
living in the United States?
Do all children have some inherent right to live in
America if they have done nothing wrong? If not, then why should the children
of illegal immigrants have such a right?
More fundamentally, why do the American people not have a
right to the protection that immigration laws provide people in other countries
around the world -- including Mexico, where illegal immigrants from other
countries get no such special treatment as Mexico and its American supporters
are demanding for illegal immigrants in the United States?
The very phrase "comprehensive" immigration
reform is part of the bad faith that has surrounded immigration issues for
decades. What "comprehensive" reform means is that border control and
amnesty should be voted on together in Congress.
Why? Because that would be politically convenient for
members of Congress, who like to be on both sides of issues, so as to minimize
the backlash from the voting public. But what "comprehensive"
immigration reform has always meant in practice is amnesty up front and a
promise to control the border later -- promises that have never been kept.
The new Republican proposal is to have some border
control criteria whose fulfillment will automatically serve as a
"trigger" to let the legalizing of illegal immigrants proceed. But
why set up some automatic triggering device to signal that the borders are
secure, when the Obama administration is virtually guaranteed to game the
system, so that amnesty can proceed?
What in the world is wrong with Congress taking up border
security first, as a separate issue, and later taking responsibility in a
Congressional vote on whether the border has become secure? Congress at least
should come out of the shadows.
The Republican plan for granting legalization up front,
while withholding citizenship, is too clever by half. It is like saying that
you can slide halfway down a slippery slope.
Republicans may yet rescue the Democrats, while
demoralizing their own supporters and utterly failing the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment