By Ed Feulner
Monday, December 30, 2013
Think it’s too late for a Christmas gift idea? Not for
the one I have in mind. It’s something you can give right now to anyone you
like.
Something that’s sorely needed in policy circles and
political debates: civility.
Alas, what we’re seeing in the marketplace of ideas today
is a disturbing growth of incivility. This breakdown isn’t a failing of either
the political left or right exclusively. It spreads from one end of the
spectrum to the other.
This schoolyard mentality, and the name-calling that
inevitably follows, are not the exclusive domain of those who attach
intemperate comments to online articles. We hear it from highly educated people
who write syndicated columns, publish books, and shout on radio and television
talk shows.
Further down the food chain, lesser lights join in,
poisoning the atmosphere still more. The Internet is a breeding ground for this
type of behavior.
Someone will post a civil comment on some political
topic. Almost immediately, someone else swings the verbal hammer of incivility,
and from there the conversation degrades into a food fight, with invective and
insult as the main course.
This breakdown is an echo of the famous “broken windows”
theory of crime, popularized years ago by criminologists James Q. Wilson and
George Kelling: When a broken window in a building is left un-repaired, the
rest are soon broken by vandals.
That’s what we see online and on the airwaves. Once
someone lowers the tone, others take it as an invitation to join in. Debates
become shouting matches.
If you watch closely, you’ll see something else
happening. The people who make civil comments basically shut down. A few join
in the food fight. But most just disappear. They leave because the atmosphere
has turned hostile to anything approaching an actual dialogue.
This is the real danger of incivility. Our free,
self-governing society requires an open exchange of ideas. That can’t happen
without a certain level of mutual respect for each other’s opinions and
viewpoints.
What we see today is an accelerating competition between
the left and the right to see which side can inflict the most damage.
Increasingly, those who take part in public debates appear to be exchanging
ideas when, in fact, they are trading insults: idiot, liar, moron, traitor.
The broken-windows theory shows us the dangers when it
comes to both crime and debates. But there’s an important difference.
When behavioral norms break down in a community, police
can restore order. But when civility breaks down in the marketplace of ideas,
the law is powerless to set things right.
And properly so. Our right to speak freely is guaranteed
by those five glorious words in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no
law ....” And yet, the need for civility has never been greater. Our nation is
divided as never before between the left and the right. We are at loggerheads
on profoundly important political and social questions. Civilization itself is
under barbaric attack from without.
Sadly, too many us are not rising to these challenges as
a democratic people. Rather than helping to reverse this decline, the rising
chorus of incivility is driving out citizens of honest intent and encouraging
those who trade in jeering and mockery.
If we are to prevail as a free, self-governing people, we
must first govern our tongues and our pens. Restoring civility to public
discourse is not an option. It is a necessity.
Who will begin the restoration of civility? It falls to
all of us to help revive this important virtue.
There’s a world of difference between attacking a
person’s argument and attacking a person’s character. We need to do more to
respect that difference. To engage in rational debate and either hold our own
or lose with grace.
We must defend our convictions with all the spirit we
can. But we should do it with all the civility we can muster, no matter what
our opponents do or say.
May that be our gift to one another, this year and every
year.
No comments:
Post a Comment