By Derek Hunter
Saturday, December 08, 2013
With a storied history of attacking people of faith as
extremists, radicals and the greatest threat this nation faces, it seems odd to
see progressives embrace religion in their “advance the agenda at any and all
costs” march. But they are, with vigor.
The wheels are coming off the progressives’ dream of a
cradle-to-grave entitlements, amnesty-ridden nanny state. Their wish list for
complete government control – and their predictions the government shutdown would
be the end of the GOP have been sacrificed to an Obamacare rollout that has
enjoyed all the success of the Hindenburg (except on MSNBC, of course, where
the Earth remains flat).
Since the government reopened on Oct. 17th, the American
people have had an unfiltered look at what progressive policy means to them,
and they don’t like it. Not only have President Obama’s approval ratings tanked
since Americans got a look at his “signature legislation,” the generic ballot
for control of the House of Representatives has gone through a dramatic flip.
The chances of Congressional Democrats retaking the House have sunk lower than
that of a hooker with an open cold sore getting a date at a eunuch convention
before the bars open.
As such, desperate times require desperate measures.
Enter the religious appeal.
It’s not overt, for the most part, and it’s certainly not
well thought out. But when the ship starts to sink you grab whatever you can to
bail it out, bucket or coffee mug.
What has happened is Democrats’ previously uncheckable
lies are now fully checkable. It’s real now. You can’t keep your doctor or
insurance, no matter how much you like them. And this hurts in the wallet – a
lot. Now that we know this does not qualify as a practical solution, certainly not
to health care anyway, Democrats –with all the credibility of a used-Pinto
salesman – now embrace “morality” as the reason to embrace Obamacare.
In a column reeking of desperation on par with a kid
hoping for a unicorn under his Christmas tree, the Washington Post’s Ryan
Cooper complied a list of reasons “Why millennials will come around on
Obamacare.” Aside from a desperate lack of understanding of health policy and
how people work, the second reason Cooper lists stands out. He writes, “Going
without health insurance is morally wrong.”
I’ll give you a minute to let that sink in.
This pathetic attempt to manipulate the unthinking into
an overwhelming sense of guilt that forces them to capitulate may work on those
with fewer IQ points than fingers, but it won’t work on those with a
third-grade education.
Cooper explains, “The only way insurance can work for
everyone is if everyone is in the system so risk can be pooled. This one
doesn’t carry much weight yet, since the system isn’t even operating. But as
time passes, this will become an important norm — and for young people, the
norm has outsized importance (older people already have a reason to get
coverage; they get sick more easily). Getting insurance will be part of living
in a decent society where everyone chips in when they can afford it, and
free-riding is frowned upon — and over time, young people will come to see this
as part of being a responsible citizen.”
Those 108 words are an incredibly inefficient way of
rephrasing “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”
Cooper’s appeal wouldn’t be noteworthy were it a lone
cactus in the desert, but it’s not.
Also this week the buffoonish Ed Schultz, MSNBC’s angry
Fred Flintstone clone, mused about how God would feel about Obamacare. “I'll
tell you what I think God thinks of the Affordable Care Act. It's a big amen!”
Not to be outdone in the office pool of idiocy, Charlie
Brown’s illegitimate child, Chris Matthews, had an offering on this theme.
Matthews temporarily snapped out of his loving gaze while interviewing the
president Thursday and put the cherry on top of one of this planet’s worst
displays of sycophantism to utter what was supposed to be a question: “You
know, Mr. President, your — your remarks the other day on economic justice to
me, as a Roman Catholic, was so resonant with what the Holy Father, Francis,
has been saying. Talk about that common Judeo-Christian or, even further,
Muslim background to the belief we have a social responsibility, a moral
responsibility to look out for people who haven't made it in this country.”
The one thing missing from these transparent attempts at
manipulation is a basic understanding of morality. Morality is not set by
government, laws are. Morality, like it or not atheists, stems from religion.
It’s not exclusive to it, but religion is the soil in which the seeds of
morality were planted. And nowhere in the Bible or Qur’an does it say
government should confiscate the fruits of one man’s labor for the benefit of
another.
True, the texts of our major religions do call for aiding
our fellow man, but they do so as part of the religion, not a mandate for every
human being.
Setting aside the gross bastardization of religion
through the integration of communist tenets by these progressives, the most
striking part of their appeal is its hypocrisy. These are the same people who
spent the better part of the last half-century proclaiming “government can’t
legislate morality” on any issue remotely moral. Perhaps Chris “Roman Catholic”
Matthews can explain where the Vatican changed its views on, say, abortion to
dovetail with the progressive agenda? Probably not.
In nearly every way government has replaced religion in
the progressive sphere. It is the grantor of rights, the arbiter of morality,
the moderator of justice, the compass of true north. Government is the
religion, and the agenda is God.
Any act done in service to the agenda is justified; the
end is what matters, the means are irrelevant. That’s how you rationalize
selling big lies, known lies, to a public wanting to believe your snake oil is
the cure for what ails them.
Perhaps progressives were correct in their charge that
religious zealots are the greatest threat to our liberty today. And if they
want to see one of those zealots, they need only look in the nearest reflective
surface.
No comments:
Post a Comment