By Ashley Herzog
Monday, June 03, 2013
The trouble with some people, said the late Ronald
Reagan, is not that they’re ignorant. It’s just that they know so much that
isn’t so.
In 1990, Michael Moore released his documentary Roger and
Me, in which he futilely pursued Roger Smith, the chairman of General Motors.
Moore wanted to ask Smith why he closed the GM plant in Flint, Michigan,
ushering in devastation and decline.
“It is a kind of David and Goliath revenge story, in
which a modest, plain-speaking nobody triumphs morally over an evil corporate
giant,” said The New York Times. Roger and Me was what journalists call “a
story too good to check.” After all, it was the ‘80s, and GM was the greedy
corporation everyone loved to hate.
But those days are long gone. After decades of attacks in
the media, GM is on life support—in part because this supposedly evil entity is
so generous to its retired employees. The corporate whipping boy du jour is BP.
BP is seeking approval to expand its refinery in Oregon,
Ohio, just west of Toledo, which it jointly owns with Husky Energy. The Toledo
Blade, the only major newspaper in town, has offered up one-sided coverage of
the project.
“BP’s recent history of major health, safety, and
environmental violations warrants review…BP incurred a record $4.5 billion
federal fine stemming from criminal violations from the Gulf spill,” the Blade
editorialized in December.
The editorial staff used the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf
of Mexico to imply that BP is a bad corporate citizen, one that will take risks
with workers’ health and safety at the Oregon refinery—and wreck the
environment as well. The citizen activist group Occupy Toledo made vague accusations
that the refinery is “dirty” and dangerous.
“BP has shown utter disregard for safety with its poor
record of safety equipment that resulted in loss of life in Texas City, Texas,
and the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf, resulting in the worst environmental
disaster in U.S. history,” activist Keith Sadler told Toledo News Now. “They
have continued the same pattern here.”
Have they? To find out, I met with the Toledo
Boilermakers at their union headquarters—and they offered a very different
picture of BP-Husky than Occupy Toledo.
“The anti-BP groups sound like Chicken Little,” said
boilermaker Paul McGrew. He said opposition to the refinery expansion is rooted
in anti-corporate bias. “It’s a transgression that they’re making money.” On
the other hand, “[BP] also offers a very good living wage.”
Isn’t that what Occupy Toledo, an offshoot of Occupy Wall
Street, says it wants for workers?
All of the Boilermakers I spoke with preferred working at
the BP-Husky refinery over other refineries, in part because their safety
standards are so high.
“With BP, safety is always at the forefront,” said
Jaramie Hilliard. “It’s almost in-your-face. If something gets spilled, they’re
all over that. Occupy Toledo isn’t even knowledgeable about what goes on at the
refinery. They rely on a lack of knowledge.”
Is BP perfect? No, of course not. The oil spill in the
Gulf was a disaster of epic proportions. (To date, they’ve also spent more than
$14 billion cleaning it up.) But the Oregon refinery’s safety record is impeccable:
employees are approaching 10 million hours worked without a lost-time injury.
Safety at the refinery broke records in 2011 and reached its best ever in 2012.
What about environmental concerns? Since 2000, overall
criteria air emissions from the refinery have decreased by over 45 percent.
Since 2002, overall permitted water emissions have decreased by 20 percent.
I contacted Occupy Toledo—a group that has loudly opposed
BP—to get their perspective on the refinery expansion. What are their main
objections?
Besides claiming that the expansion would provide a
“minimal” number of jobs and create pollution, an Occupy Toledo activist told
me, “BP is a corporation and as a corporation it exists to maximize profits for
its shareholders in order to do this all questions of ethics and morals are
pushed to the side…we do not believe that they have ethics or morals.”
Groups like Occupy Toledo may sincerely believe such
things, but believing doesn’t make it so. This is a conflict of knee-jerk,
anti-corporate emotionalism versus the interests of blue-collar workers.
When environmentalists and left-wing activists win,
workers lose.
No comments:
Post a Comment