By Phyllis Schlafly
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
It has become evident that Barack Obama's definition of
"fundamentally transforming the United States" includes Big Brother
harassing selected conservatives while monitoring everybody's email and
telephone traffic. These seem to be among the surprising duties of the Internal
Revenue Service and the National Security Agency (NSA), respectively.
It's clear that the IRS has been unfairly targeting and
mistreating more than 500 conservative organizations, especially if they use
such words as "tea party," "liberty" or
"patriotic" on their tax returns or tax-exempt applications. IRS then
bogs them down with years of delays and demands for nosy and unnecessary
information.
A House Ways and Means Committee hearing on June 4
exposed some of the IRS's obnoxious behavior. The representative of an Iowa
anti-abortion organization applying for tax-exempt status said the IRS asked
her about the content of her organization's prayers.
Sue Martinek of Coalition for Life of Iowa testified that
the IRS asked every board member to sign a letter pledging in writing that they
would not picket Planned Parenthood.
John Eastman, chairman of the National Organization for
Marriage, said that the IRS leaked the organization's list of its best donors
(a page in the tax return titled "not for public inspection"). The
list was then published on the website of the Human Rights Campaign, a pro-gay
organization which is the victim organization's "principal political
opponent" on the marriage issue.
It's clear that the leak came directly from the IRS
because the leaked page showed "internal IRS stamps," which exist
only within the IRS. In another example, Karen Kinney, representing the San
Fernando Valley Patriots, said the IRS gave her only 20 days to answer 35 items
divided into 80 "sub-points of inquiry."
Lois Lerner, head of the IRS unit on tax-exempt
organizations, took the Fifth Amendment when the House Committee tried to
interrogate her.
Cleta Mitchell, a preeminent expert on political tax law,
is representing nine conservative organizations that have been subjected to
unusual delays and unlawful demands for confidential information. One of her
clients has been waiting for approval of its nonprofit status since 2009.
Another serious problem is the wholesale stealing of U.S.
military and industrial secrets and intellectual property by organized cyber
hackers operating from China, Russia and India. But Obama was too scared to
challenge China's president at their meeting last week.
Obama ended his recent meeting with China's President Xi
Jinping with a secret session (no notetakers present). That's dangerous! How do
we know Obama didn't promise future concessions like he did to the Russians
(when he didn't realize the mic was live) during his last meeting with Putin's
representative?
As to the snooping by the Obama administration of
Americans' Internet usage and calling patterns, at least NSA employees have
taken an oath of loyalty to the United States of America, but we do not have
that assurance about the employees of the giant computer companies that are
playing ball with the NSA to gather this nosy information about Americans. The
big companies have hired thousands of foreigners to do their computer work and
successfully pressured the Gang of Eight to include in their amnesty
legislation provisions to greatly increase the number of college-educated
foreigners they can import.
Obama says that judges on the secret Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court (known as the FISA Court) approved the current NSA
surveillance activities. In 2012, out of 1,856 applications for warrants, this
court rejected zero, which sounds like FISA just rubber-stamps what the
administration wants.
Obama said, "If people can't trust" the
government officials responsible for the NSA snooping, "we're going to
have some problems." At least the president got that right; we do have
problems, both about the personal information our security agencies are
collecting and about information not discovered about real terrorists.
The Obama sycophants are trying to spin the narrative
that this Big Brotherism is for the purpose of locating potential terrorists (even
though Obama already proclaimed the "end" of the war on terrorism).
But with all this massive effort, why wasn't the Obama network able to screen
out the family of the Boston Marathon bombers despite many obvious clues?
It tells us a lot about the Obama administration when we
compare the administration's gathering of Internet and phone records of
hundreds of millions of Americans with the fact that it was incapable of doing
a competent background check on Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev either before or
after his trip to Russia, even after being alerted by the Russians that he was
dangerous.
Nor could the Obama administration figure out the mortal
danger from the killer Major Nidal Hasan even after he put "Soldier of
Allah" on his business card and gave a PowerPoint presentation to his
military friends on what he wanted to do to infidels.
No comments:
Post a Comment