By Jonah Goldberg
Friday, February 01, 2013
The Republicans are doomed. Conservatism is over.
President Obama is conducting a mop-up operation at this point.
That’s the basic consensus in places like New York City;
Washington, D.C.; and other citadels of blue America.
And let’s be fair, liberals have every reason to gloat —
a little. The GOP has its troubles. Long-term demographic trends;
often-irrational animosity from Hollywood, the media, and academia; a thumbless
grasp of the culture on the part of many Republicans: All of these things
create a headwind for the party and the broader conservative movement.
But here’s the weird part. That’s all true of
presidential politics, but less so when it comes to state politics or even
other federal races. In 2010, the GOP had its best performance in congressional
races since 1938.
In North Carolina, a state that is supposed to represent
the trends benefitting Democrats — it’s attracting liberal northern
transplants, immigrants, high-tech workers, etc. — the GOP now has veto-proof
majorities in the state house and senate. Last November, North Carolina became
the 30th state with a GOP governor.
What gives?
There are a lot of possible explanations that are not
mutually exclusive. Obama is more popular than his party. Mitt Romney was less
popular than the ideas he had such a hard time expressing. Presidential
electorates are different.
This last one is definitely true when you compare who
voted in 2010 and who voted in 2012. The 2010 electorate was older and whiter.
The Obama coalition of 2012 included younger voters, minorities, and so-called
“low-information voters.”
No matter the merits of these observations, they don’t
fully explain why Republicans are doing so well on the policy front. In states
as diverse as Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, Nebraska, Michigan, New Jersey, Texas,
and a half-dozen others, Republicans have been implementing impressive — even
miraculous — reforms.
In pro-Obama Wisconsin, Governor Scott Walker beat back a
historic attack from organized labor. And Michigan — Michigan! — recently
became a right-to-work state, which I’m pretty sure is mentioned in the
AFL-CIO’s bylaws as a sign of the end times.
I think an overlooked part of the story is the fact that
Americans tend to see federal and local governments differently. At the local
level, people seem to have a better grasp that it’s their tax dollars at work.
They are far more sensitive to tax increases and more easily outraged by
spending boondoggles. They understand the importance of sustainable economic
growth.
This fact benefits Republicans, although state-level
Democrats tend to be more fiscally responsible at the local level as well.
(Rahm Emanuel is far more fiscally responsible as Chicago’s mayor than he ever
was as Obama’s chief of staff.)
Meanwhile, what gets Republicans elected at the local
level gets them in trouble at the federal level. Again, there are many reasons
for this. But I think one of them is that we’ve come to see the federal
government as some sort of mystical entity empowered to right all of the wrongs
in society. If there’s a problem, there “should” be a federal response, the
costs or feasibility of that response be damned.
While Romney’s infamous riff about the “47 percent” was
profoundly flawed, the simple reality is that millions of people who do, in
fact, pay federal income taxes do not care about those tax dollars in the same
way they care about their local tax dollars. This is true of people who get
more from the federal government than they pay in, but it’s also true for
millions of affluent voters as well.
Our presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, talk about
their “visions” for America, as if being a president requires you to impose
some quasi-religious vision on the country.
But the Democrats are simply better at talking about
government in spiritual terms. Indeed, such testifying is Obama’s one
indisputable gift. Democrats talk about the federal government doing things
we’d want God to do if God dabbled in public policy. They use the logic of
religion, which holds that there is a unitary and seamless nature to all good
things, and therefore no good thing government does should come at the expense
of some other good thing government might do. And, worst of all, they castigate
anyone who opposes more spending on, say, “the children” or “the environment”
as morally retrograde and “against children” and “against the environment.”
The challenge for Republicans is to convince the American
people that the government isn’t magic, and that all of its money is your
money, its debts your debts. I don’t think the GOP is doomed, but America might
be if Americans remain unconvinced too much longer.
No comments:
Post a Comment