Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Let's say that you own a business. And let's say that as
a person of faith, you decide to use the profits from that business to support,
at least in some small part, traditional marriage. Now let's say that your
political opponents find your position stunning and launch a boycott against
your business.
So far, no harm, no foul. It may be irritating that your
political opponents choose to make your personal political predilections the
basis of a crushing economic attack. But it's their right.
But now let's say your political opponents are in
government. And let's say they use the power of their office to shut down your
business -- not because you violated any law or broke any regulation, but
because they don't like your position on traditional marriage.
This would be fascism.
Fascists deny that democracy should decide whether or not
you have a right to engage in business. They suggest, instead, that political
actors, armed with a vague sense of the general will, ought to enforce that
vague sense rather than the law. Mao Zedong fervently supported this notion; in
his "Little Red Book," he asked where "correct ideas come
from." His answer: him. And only politically correct ideas could be
tolerated.
Welcome to Barack Obama's America.
Two of Obama's closest political allies, Mayor Thomas
Menino of Boston and Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, came out last week in favor
of banning Chick-fil-A from their cities. Chick-fil-A's President and Chief
Operating Officer, Dan Cathy, is a supporter of traditional marriage; the
company has given money to groups that support traditional marriage
politically. This, in the minds of Menino and Emanuel, is a grave sin in need
of rapid repentance. "Chick-fil-A's values are not Chicago's values,"
said Emanuel of a city in which dead people vote and live people dodge bullets.
"I was angry to learn on the heels of your prejudiced statements about
your search for a site to locate in Boston," Menino wrote to Cathy.
"There is no place for your discrimination on Boston's Freedom Trail and
no place for your company alongside it."
Now, neither Emanuel nor Menino can legally bar
Chick-fil-A from their cities. But this attitude -- that businesses are worthy
of government bans simply for failing to tow the liberal line -- now infuses
the Democratic Party. It's why President Obama's allies at Media Matters
consistently team up with him to launch devastating boycotts against
conservative business people. It's why those public relations assaults are
invariably well coordinated with government actors who suggest that force of
law be used to punish those conservative business people.
This is the difference between free speech and fascism.
It's one thing for people to choose not to engage in business with people with
whom they disagree. That's often nasty and extreme, but it's certainly within
First Amendment territory. It's another thing entirely for the government to
step in to punish people who disagree with liberal policies, simply because
they disagree with liberal policies. That's fascistic. It's deeply dangerous.
And it's becoming the ugly new attitude of the Democratic Party elite.
No comments:
Post a Comment