Friday, August 03, 2012
A young Chinese man is under arrest for a rampage killing
in Liaoning province. The knife-wielding 17-year-old reportedly killed eight
people, including two relatives of his estranged girlfriend, and wounded five
others.
Terrible story. But Agence France-Presse, in an account
widely circulated by Yahoo and other news outlets, knew just whom to blame:
capitalism. AFP explained, "Violent crime has been on the rise in China in
recent decades as the nation's economy has boomed and the gap between rich and
poor has expanded at an alarming rate.
Experts say the increase in assaults shows that China is
paying the price for focusing on more than 30 years of economic growth while
ignoring problems linked to rapid social change."
Where to begin? Do critics of capitalism and economic
growth really want to invite a comparison of body counts between pre- and
post-1978 China? That was the year that Deng Xiaoping began the turn away from
communism and toward free-market principles in the world's most populous prison.
Here's the way to begin thinking about poverty in China.
Between 1958 and 1961, an estimated 30 million Chinese died of starvation. It
wasn't a natural disaster, but an entirely political death toll. Mao Zedong had
forcibly collectivized agriculture and then imposed farming practices that
defied experience and logic. He insisted that "in company grain grows
fast; seeds are happiest when growing together." China's farms were
accordingly obliged to sow seeds at five to 10 times the normal distribution --
resulting in widespread crop failures.
There were other state dictates that contributed to the
catastrophe; they exterminated the sparrows, which resulted in an explosion of
the number of parasites; they increased flooding by contributing to soil
erosion; they distorted the ecosystem by focusing on one big cereal crop at the
expense of other land uses, including the raising of livestock. As "The
Black Book of Communism" recounts, " ... the somewhat surreal slogan
for the year 1958 ... was 'Live frugally in a year of plenty.'" Many
peasants were too weak from starvation to harvest what modest crops were
produced, leading the national press to "begin to sing the praises of a
daily nap, and medical professors came out to explain the particular physiology
of the Chinese, for whom fat and proteins were an unnecessary luxury."
Reports of cannibalism were widespread.
Even after the Great Famine had subsided, an estimated 65
percent of the Chinese population lived below the poverty line. This was not
American-style poverty, with food stamps, housing allowances, welfare benefits
and Medicaid. This was living on less than $1.25 per day. This was stunted
growth from malnutrition and early death and disfigurement from disease. It was
high infant and maternal mortality. It was reduced life expectancy. Even today,
the Chinese acknowledge that 6.5 million children under the age of 5 suffer
from stunted growth, meaning two or more standard deviations below the World
Health Organization's standards for median height by age.
After the Chinese introduced free market reforms in the
late 1970s, the nation experienced the largest and fastest decline in poverty
in world history. While 65 percent had been impoverished before 1978, only 4
percent lived below the poverty line by 2007. A certain skepticism is always
necessary when dealing with official statistics from the Chinese government,
but even if the 4 percent figure is inaccurate, the evidence of Chinese growth
is obvious and undeniable. And contra AFP, one of the first consequences of
increased prosperity was a reduction in inequality in China. Hundreds of
millions of people have been lifted out of poverty because the state abandoned
its control of economic activity and permitted freer exchange of goods and
services.
China remains a rigid dictatorship. But the Chinese
experience with economic liberalization, like that of India, which abandoned
socialist policies in the early 1990s (though its government had never been
totalitarian), mirrors that of other nations that embraced free markets: West
Germany, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Chile and Israel, among many
others. Free markets are not just associated with wealth; they are also
indispensable to it.
AFP concluded its story by noting that "Studies have
described a rise in the prevalence of mental disorders in China, some of them
linked to stress as the pace of life becomes faster and socialist support
systems falter." There is sheer preposterous propaganda. What
"study" could possibly prove that stress regarding "the pace of
life" and the decline of "socialist support systems" (whatever
they are) had increased mental illness?
Western intellectuals, very much including the press, are
still in love with socialism -- even its communist variant. Wonder if anyone in
China would agree to go back to the good old days.
No comments:
Post a Comment