By Kevin D. Williamson
Friday, September 04, 2020
Left-wing militias are crisscrossing the country
executing a “coordinated attack on law enforcement, on public property, and on
private property,” says Attorney General Bill Barr. “And that can’t be
tolerated.”
Nonsense. Of course it can be tolerated. It is
being tolerated. Bill Barr is tolerating it as we speak and has been for
months. The ladies and gentlemen of the Trump administration have a funny way
of forgetting that they are in charge right now, today, that they are not
awaiting a mandate but already have received one. The Democrats who run our
most troubled cities are in charge, too, and are doing approximately squat.
President Donald Trump whispers about puppeteers pulling
the strings in the “dark shadows.” Could be. My friend and colleague Andrew C.
McCarthy, who used to prosecute terrorists before he switched to terrorizing
prosecutors (public services takes many forms) suggests that the Trump
administration could get some mileage out of the Travel Act, which would
empower the feds to treat the riots as an interstate conspiracy and go after
what might ordinarily be understood as crime falling into the jurisdiction of
state and local authorities. That’s as good an idea for a law-enforcement
response as I have heard.
But what if there is no conspiracy?
Memes and fake news are not the only categories of things
that are propagated virally. Attitudes go viral. Beliefs go viral. Moral
commitments go viral. And violence can go viral, too. There isn’t necessarily
someone in the “dark shadows” inciting the madness of crowds. Madness is in the
nature of crowds.
This is not an entirely new development. In the world of
Islamist terrorism, which McCarthy knows so well, there have been both tightly
organized, hierarchical organizations and loose affiliations of shared attitude
and virally transmitted technique. The men who carried out the 9/11 attacks
were part of an organized conspiracy; the man who carried out the Orlando
massacre, as far as we can tell, was not, although he was at least acquainted
with an American who carried out a suicide bombing in Syria. School shootings
and other mass-murder spectacles are not organized by a committee. They are
organic horrors, not contrived ones.
For years, white-power nuts, animal-rights wackos, and
daft radical environmentalists developed a doctrine and practice of “leaderless
resistance,” precisely because McCarthy and his former colleagues in federal
law enforcement have developed such fearsome expertise at detecting, busting
up, and prosecuting organized criminal conspiracies and, to a tragically lesser
extent, organized terrorist conspiracies. Louis Beam, the racist revolutionary
who helped to popularize the concept of leaderless resistance in the
white-power world, had previously been a member of the Ku Klux Klan, an organization
whose members have been successfully prosecuted for their crimes — Jeff
Sessions sent one to the executioner in Alabama.
Organized groups such as the KKK have vulnerabilities
that loose coalitions — which by their nature are self-compartmentalizing — do
not. A generation ago, those vulnerabilities were offset by significant
logistical advantages. But changes in communication technology (which includes
financial technology) have rendered many of those logistical advantages
obsolete. You don’t need meetings or a newsletter when you have social media.
Radicals don’t have to go out looking very hard for recruits in 2020 — recruits
come to them, self-radicalized. The nature of the way information, attitudes,
and money move through modern society is much better fitted to the fluid and
distributed model of terrorism than it is to the bureaucratic or paramilitary
model. The IRA and the PLO are outmoded forms. And recent social and
technological changes raise real questions about what kind of effective state
action is actually possible: In a very short period of time, we have gone from
being able to 3-D print guns to being able to 3-D print drugs. Good luck,
regulators.
The motive principle animating the riots under way in
Kenosha, Portland, etc., is less a conspiracy than it is an emergent religious
phenomenon. The model for understanding what is happening in our burning cities
is not the Mafia — it’s the Moonies.
That radical movements and revolutions take on a
religious character is an insight that is hardly original to me. We saw it in
the early days of the United States with the apotheosis of George Washington,
who became a kind of American Divus Iulius whose great personal integrity and
dignity retroactively sanctified the revolution. Mao Zedong was a world-shaking
character not because of any deep-seeing political philosophy but because he
became a figure of national redemption for China — who was, and remains, the
central figure in a cult. (Chairman Xi even dresses
up like him on special occasions.) With its conversion narratives, its
rites of confession, its ceremonies of excommunication, and, above all, its
ritual of mass self-sanctification in communion with its celebrated martyrs,
what we are seeing in the cities is essentially religious in character. Those
who deride the current moral hysteria in the United States as the “Great
Awokening” are not wrong to compare it to the Great Awakening of the 18th
century.
Those who compare it to the Cultural Revolution are not
wrong to do so, either. It is, in effect, Maoism without Mao.
For now.
One of the great dangers of the current moment is that
some genuinely talented demagogue will comprehend the essentially cultic aspect
of the current disorder and capitalize on it. Barack Obama was a reasonably
gifted demagogue, and one who became, for a nontrivial part of the American
people, a figure of national redemption, at least until he had been around long
enough to demonstrate his superabundant fallibility. Joe Biden is as vicious
and dishonest and grimy a hustler as this country has to offer, but he does not
have the demagogic chops to get out in front of this unholy procession. He
isn’t leading it — he is being dragged along.
At this point in the conversation, your thoughts may turn
queasily to Kamala Harris. But she is not a likely candidate, either: She is
intelligent, ruthless, and amoral, and the demagogue to be feared is only two
of those things: intelligent, yes, and willing to be brutal when deemed
necessary, but also a true believer and a person of genuine moral principle.
Senator Harris falls short of the mark. The real danger is not some such clown
as Bernie Sanders or an opportunist such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but a
figure along the lines of Kwame Nkrumah, the charismatic Ghanaian
nationalist-socialist who made his country into a one-party police state but
was generally understood, even by many of his enemies, to be a man of great personal
integrity. (The question of integrity is distinct from that of competence.)
Vladimir Lenin did not get into the revolution business looking for a payday.
Fidel Castro was a gangster who
liked to wear two Rolexes on the same wrist; Pol Pot practiced,
murderously, what he preached.
If you are perplexed by what is happening in the cities
and these ecstasies of fire and violence, try thinking about the political
career of John Calvin, Savonarola, or Joseph Smith. Ritual and redemption are
powerful, especially in the context of a community of believers brought
together in suffering and trauma.
Bill Barr no doubt will do what he can. A criminal
conspiracy can be countered with arrests and prosecutions. A new faith is a
slippery thing — and a dangerous one.
No comments:
Post a Comment