By John McCormack
Tuesday, August 11, 2020
So, it’s Kamala. After all the speculation about whom
Biden might pick to be his running mate, he chose the woman most likely to get
the nod all along, according to the betting markets.
The California senator was and is widely seen as the
“safe” choice, given the constraints Biden had imposed on himself. He pledged
to pick a woman, and after the George Floyd protests he seemed increasingly
likely to pick an African-American woman.
Harris checks both boxes, and as the only black female
Democratic senator or governor in the United States, she definitely seems to be
a safer pick in the middle of an economic and health crisis than a former state
legislator from Georgia, the mayor of Atlanta, or a little-known House member
from Florida or California. Harris was vetted somewhat by the press during her
presidential campaign, and she can be a poised speaker — the kind of
relentlessly on-message politician who will likely avoid any
campaign-destroying gaffes.
But was Harris really the safest and smartest pick?
To win in 2020, Biden needs to turn out the moderate voters
who abandoned Republicans in 2018. And with that in mind, Harris certainly
comes with some risks. Republicans have been painting Biden as a stalking horse
for the left wing of the Democratic party: Sure, Biden might say he opposes
the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, goes the Republican message, but
just you watch who’s really going to hold power. And the Democratic
presidential nominee who turns 78 in November — amid a plague that is
particularly deadly to the elderly — went ahead and picked a running mate who
supports Medicare for All and the Green New Deal and federal legislation that
would override state laws restricting late-term abortions . . . and on
and on.
Despite her attempts to align with the left wing of the
Democratic Party on almost every matter of policy, Harris did little to
generate actual enthusiasm on the left during the Democratic primary. She
hemmed and hawed on Medicare for All’s politically toxic proposal to abolish
private health insurance and made the preposterous claim that universal health
care would not require any new taxes on the middle class. She effectively
portrayed Biden as a racist for opposing forced busing in the 1970s, and then
backtracked on whether she now supported new forced-busing measures.
Although naming an African-American woman is supposed to
be a compassionate response to the police killing of George Floyd, Joe Biden
and fellow 2020 candidate Tulsi Gabbard ripped Harris apart at the debates on
criminal justice. “Biden alluded to a crime lab scandal that involved
[Harris’s] office and resulted in more than 1,000 drug cases being dismissed.
Gabbard claimed Harris ‘blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man
from death row until she was forced to do so.’ Both of these statements are
accurate,” the Sacramento Bee reported
after a July 2019 Democratic debate.
At the same time, Harris is vulnerable to attacks from
the right on criminal justice. Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein called on
Harris to seek the death penalty in 2004 for a man who murdered police officer
Isaac Espinoza with an AK-47, but Harris refused to do so. Last year,
Espinoza’s widow spoke on camera about Harris for the first time in a tearful
interview. “She did not call me,” Renata Espinoza told CNN. “I felt like she
had just taken something from us. She had just taken justice from us.”
In Harris’s 2010 campaign for California attorney
general, her only statewide race against a Republican, she won by less than one
point even as Democratic gubernatorial and senatorial candidates won by double
digits on the same ballot.
It’s true that any running mate comes with risks, and
some of the problems that dogged Harris in the Democratic presidential primary
will be smaller problems in the general election. Her lackluster style on the
stump won’t matter much in a campaign without real campaign events. Her
tendency to be evasive and hedge on policy in interviews won’t be as much of a
temptation: She can fall back on saying her agenda as vice president would be
Biden’s agenda.
But the fact remains that Harris would be a heartbeat away from the presidency, and that’s why former national-security adviser Susan Rice may have been a smarter pick. Her experience in the White House could have reassured voters she’d know what to do in a crisis, and she could have aligned herself squarely with Biden on matters of policy, so there would be less worry among voters that Biden’s vice president would pursue a far-left agenda in the event that Biden can’t serve out a full term. For all the boxes Harris does check, she doesn’t check either of these.
No comments:
Post a Comment