National Review Online
Friday, June 01, 2018
Originally President Donald Trump’s tariffs on steel and
aluminum exempted imports from Canada, Mexico, and Europe. No longer. The
administration has broadened the application of its tariffs even as their
strategic and economic costs are becoming more apparent.
The law gives Trump the authority to impose tariffs to
protect national security. These tariffs are, however, an abuse of that law.
The Department of Defense has explained that the military needs only 3 percent
of our domestic steel and aluminum production, and our largest supplier,
Canada, is an ally — albeit one that now has reason to be miffed with us. The
steel and aluminum tariffs have undermined our ability to make common cause
with other countries against Chinese mercantilism, and even aided China’s
campaign to gain influence among them.
Economically, we will pay for these tariffs twice over.
Companies that rely on steel and aluminum will pay higher prices — and those
companies are responsible for far more employment than the steel and aluminum
industries themselves. For that reason, President George W. Bush’s steel
tariffs were estimated to cost more jobs than they protected, as were President
Barack Obama’s tire tariffs. There is no reason to expect happier results this
time. And other countries are also imposing retaliatory tariffs on us.
Most congressional Republicans think the tariffs, by
hurting their constituents, will also hurt their reelection prospects. They
would like to campaign on today’s strong economy and the tax and regulatory
policies that have helped to bring it about. The president’s new trade taxes
counteract those policies.
On trade as on other matters, Congress has over the years
given the executive branch too much authority that is too prone to abuse. In
other areas, the president and his appointees have been effective foes of the
arbitrary and capricious executive power — the unaccountable “administrative
state” — that has thereby been unleashed. When it comes to trade, they have
decided instead to illustrate the dangers.
No comments:
Post a Comment