By Kyle Smith
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Accepting the 2005 Oscar he won for gaining a few pounds
and being tortured in Syriana, George
Clooney made the case for Hollywood as America’s moral conscience:
You know, we are a little bit out
of touch in Hollywood every once in a while, I think. It’s probably a good
thing. We’re the ones who talked about AIDS when it was just being whispered,
and we talked about civil rights when it wasn’t really popular. And we, you
know, we bring up subjects, we are the ones — this Academy, this group of
people gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in
the backs of theaters. I’m proud to be a part of this Academy, proud to be part
of this community, and proud to be out of touch. And I thank you so much for
this.
Leaving aside that, on the night she won her Oscar for Gone with the Wind, McDaniel
was in fact made to sit away from her colleagues at a table against a far wall,
where was Clooney’s moral conscience for the 20 years he was silent about the
serial sexual predator who was running amok in his own industry? How can Clooney,
Meryl Streep, and their peers continue to claim America’s moral high ground
when they simply shrugged at what was going on with their pal Harvey Weinstein?
Their excuse — “We didn’t know” — doesn’t cut it.
Clooney’s Ocean’s Eleven-Twelve-Thirteen
costar Brad Pitt knew very well what Harvey Weinstein was up to. Pitt had once
threatened to give Weinstein a “Missouri whooping” after the producer sexually
harassed his then-girlfriend Gwyneth Paltrow in the 1990s. All of those months
the pair spent on sets together, they never thought to compare notes on
Weinstein’s behavior? Another Ocean’s
buddy, Matt Damon, personally called up Sharon Waxman, then a New York Times reporter, to intercede
against a story that would have been unflattering to Weinstein. Was Damon also
not curious about what was going on with his producer-mentor? Did Damon also
never talk to Pitt on the set of the Ocean’s
movies? Or on the set of The Departed,
which Pitt produced and Damon starred in? Or maybe in between takes on Happy Feet 2, in which Pitt and Damon
played a zany pair of gay crustaceans?
Note the curiously limited wording of the denials from
Damon and Clooney, though. Entertainment reporters, tending to be both a) in
awe of their subjects and b) unschooled in Washington-style spot-the-loophole
weasel talk, haven’t quite nailed down what either of them knew. “We know this
stuff goes on in the world,” Damon said. “I did five or six movies with Harvey.
I never saw this. I think a lot of actors have come out and said, everybody’s saying
we all knew. That’s not true. This type of predation happens behind closed
doors, and out of public view.” “I’ve never seen any of this behavior — ever,” Clooney told The Daily Beast.
Of course Damon and Clooney never saw the misbehavior. When Weinstein wants a tête-à-tête with Ashley
Judd in his bathrobe, Damon and Clooney aren’t going to be invited along. The
question is, did they know what
Weinstein was up to? Clooney insists, “I had no idea that it had gone to the
level of having to pay off eight women for their silence, and that these women
were threatened and victimized.” The comment seems to be limited to “these
women” — the eight who were paid off. Like a politician, Clooney is answering a
question nobody asked. Did he know Weinstein was inviting actresses to business
meetings that turned into bedroom meetings that turned into sexual overtures
with career implications? Weinstein has been, for more than two decades, one of
the most-talked-about figures in Hollywood. Could news of such revolting acts
really never have reached Clooney’s ears? It seems more likely that Clooney was
part of a conspiracy of silence.
Movie Clooney is very interested in exposing the
pernicious actions of oil companies (Syriana),
chemical companies (Michael Clayton),
TV hucksters (Money Monster),
McCarthyism (Good Night, and Good Luck),
and the masterminds of the first Gulf War (Three
Kings). Real-life Clooney plugs his ears when people in Hollywood gossip about
a subject that has evidently been a hot topic of conversation since Pauly Shore
was considered a movie star. Weinstein’s habits were such an open secret they
were joked
about on 30 Rock and the Oscar
telecast.
As for Streep, she no doubt believed she was speaking
truth to power when, upon receipt of a career honor at the Golden Globes
ceremony this year, she spent her entire speech heaving broadsides at President
Trump. Does Trump constitute power in her world, though? It isn’t like Trump
can do much of anything in response except send a couple of grumpy tweets.
Power, to Streep, is someone like Weinstein, someone who could cast her or not
cast her, possibly even influence the hiring decisions of others. And
Weinstein’s skill in campaigning for Oscars is unparalleled. He was widely
credited for winning her a third Oscar for The
Iron Lady, notably by Streep herself, who said in her acceptance speech, “I
want to thank God — Harvey Weinstein.”
What are young actresses propositioned by Weinstein
supposed to make of it when the foremost practitioner of their profession, the
one they look up to more than any other and in whose footsteps they would
dearly love to follow, is praising the executive who behaved so reprehensibly
toward them? The message could hardly be more clear to them that Weinsteinian
behavior is simply the price that must be paid.
Or are we to believe that Streep is the only actress on
earth who didn’t know what Weinstein was up to? The New Yorker story this week contains this line about Lucia Stoller
(now Evans), an actress who says Weinstein forced her to give him oral sex.
“The summer before her senior year at Middlebury College,” we learn, the
producer approached the young woman at a party. “Evans wanted to be an actress,
and although she had heard rumors about Weinstein she let him have her number.”
Would Streep have us believe that aspiring
actresses still in college knew more
about industry players than she did? Streep now says flatly, “I didn’t know
about these other offenses. . . . I did not know about his having meetings in
his hotel room, his bathroom, or other inappropriate, coercive acts.” Think of
all of the hundreds of actresses, and thousands of other industry people,
Streep has worked with over the years. None of this ever came up?
For Clooney or Damon or Pitt or Streep to pick up a phone
and call a reporter to speak about Harvey Weinstein’s predatory behavior all
these years would have taken a minimal amount of guts. It could have cost them
gigs, or awards. The Weinstein debacle has implicated more or less everyone in
Hollywood who knew about the abhorrent behavior and remained silent, which must
mean just about everyone in Hollywood. From now on the leading Hollywood
personalities deserve nothing but derision when they pretend to be courageous
truth-tellers. They are neither.
No comments:
Post a Comment