By Matt Barber
Sunday, April 28, 2013
What’s the big deal?
I mean, why are we surprised that an abortionist and his
staff would, behind the walls of an always-lethal abortion clinic, commit one
of the most horrific serial killings in American history? What did you think
abortionists do, heal people?
Why are we taken aback that there was no oversight, no regulation,
or that Planned Parenthood, though privy to the clinic’s filthy, medieval
conditions, refused to report it to the Department of Health? After all,
Planned Parenthood, Barack Obama and the DNC have vehemently opposed all laws –
such as those in Virginia, Mississippi and elsewhere – designed to prevent
exactly the same kind of squalid conditions found in Gosnell’s clinic (and
others), laws that simply direct abortion mills to meet the same minimal safety
standards required of all other medical facilities.
You didn’t really buy that whole “women’s health”
nonsense, did you?
Sucker.
Seriously, there are so few sociopathic doctors left
willing to hack alive those inconvenient little buggers; so you anti-choice
nuts need to just chill. Who cares about “blood smeared walls,” or babies left
to drown in toilets, or snipped spinal cords, or dismembered body parts kept in
jars, or screaming, crying newborns silenced by decapitation? What did you
think women were “choosing” with abortion, some kind of medical treatment?
We’re not removing a tumor here. You’ve got to kill a few babies to make a
“reproductive freedom” omelette. Besides, there’s billions to be made in the
death racket.
Let’s keep it real. The only difference between what
happened in Gosnell’s Philadelphia clinic and what happens every day in Planned
Parenthoods across the country can be measured by a matter of inches – by the
child’s proximity to her mother in the room. Whether the baby is in the womb or
12 inches removed, a dead baby is a dead baby, right? So why all the drama?
Relax. You know, Roe v. Wade and all.
Besides, what’s an abortionist to do (wink, wink) if that
resilient little pest does survive, if she’s born alive? I appreciate President
Obama’s candor on the matter. Like he said, laws preventing abortionists like
Gosnell from finishing her off are “really designed simply to burden the
original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an
abortion.” Snippety-snip, eh, Barack? You know, choice and all.
Or, as Gosnell attorney Jack McMahon noted during the
trial, it’s “ludicrous … to say a baby is born alive because it moves one
time.” You anti-choice zealots don’t get to define the terms here. One man’s
“alive” is another man’s “unwanted pregnancy.” Potato, potahto.
And why are we stunned that the mainstream media have
spiked a story with all the bloody and salacious newsworthy trappings that –
had abortion not been involved – would have filled the news cycle 24/7?
You think some now-barren, 40-something copy editor who’s
had five abortions wants to draw attention to its grisly reality? You think she
wants to be reminded of her own string of dismembered little choices? No,
better to sip appletinis with the boys down at the National Press Club and
pretend it never happened. Now that’s reproductive freedom! That’s freedom of
the press!
In reality, to the media, this stuff is old news. Gosnell
is on trial for doing something nearly indistinguishable from partial-birth
abortion – a “never necessary” procedure (according to the AMA) Obama vocally
endorsed. He said that banning it was part of a concerted effort “to steadily
roll back the hard-won rights of American women.”
Furthermore, why are we surprised that this
rush-to-judgment-when-it-suits-his-political-agenda president suddenly “can’t
comment” on Gosnell “because it’s an active trial”? Remember? This is the same
race-baiting “community organizer” who said that Cambridge police “acted
stupidly” when arresting a combative black Harvard professor who, as it turned
out, was himself acting stupidly. Don’t forget; this is the same president who
had no problem laying guilt on a “presumed innocent” George Zimmerman, saying,
“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”
Funny, I actually do have a son and, when he was born, he
looked a lot like those little boys Gosnell and Planned Parenthood kill every
day. Come to think of it, most of them looked almost identical to Trayvon, skin
color and all.
Curious.
Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., called Obama out on his refusal
to address Gosnell: “Mr. President, your silence on this issue is deafening,”
he said.
I agree. The left’s silence – to include the mainstream
media – speaks volumes. It’s a tacit endorsement of Gosnell’s gruesome
practices. And why shouldn’t it be?
To “pro-choicers” it’s not that old Kermit did anything
wrong; it’s just that he got caught doing it. He was careless. He pulled back
the curtain of “reproductive freedom” to reveal abortion’s house of horrors.
Kermit Gosnell is liberalism personified, and liberalism relies on deceit. The
“progressive” culture is a culture of death. Moral relativism is as moral
relativism does.
Speaking of moral relativism, on Friday the first sitting
president in United States history gave the keynote address at a Planned
Parenthood fundraiser. Nice timing. Even as the Gosnell mass-murder trial wraps
up, Obama was lending the full weight of his presidency to a mass-murder
celebration.
His message? All you Planned Parenthood-hating,
anti-Gosnell right-wingers better listen up: “No matter how great the
challenge, no matter how fierce the opposition, there’s one thing that the past
few years have shown,” he promised. “That Planned Parenthood is not going
anywhere. It’s not going anywhere today. It’s not going anywhere tomorrow.”
Yeah, we’ll see about that, slick.
No comments:
Post a Comment