By Victor Davis Hanson
Thursday, May 16, 2013
In Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, he ran to
the left of Hillary Clinton as a moral reformer. Obama promised to transcend
the old politics and bring a new era of hope-and-change transparency to
Washington. Five years later, those vows are in shambles.
True, the murder of four Americans in Benghazi has become
a mess of partisan bickering. But the disturbing facts now transcend politics.
The Obama administration -- the president himself, Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney --
all at various times blamed an obscure video maker for the "spontaneous
violence" that killed Americans last September.
The problem is not just that such scapegoating was
untrue, but that our officials knew it was untrue when they said it -- given
both prior CIA talking-point briefings and phone calls from those on the ground
during the attacks.
One theme ties all the bizarre aspects of Benghazi
scandal together -- the doctored talking points, the inexplicable failure to
beef up diplomatic security before the attacks and to send in help during the
fighting, the jailing of a petty con artist on the false charge that his
amateur video had led to attacks on our consulate, and the shabby treatment of
nonpartisan State Department whistleblowers.
There was an overarching pre-election desire last year to
downplay any notion that al-Qaeda remained a serious danger after the much
ballyhooed killing of Osama bin Laden. Likewise, Libya was not supposed to be a
radical Islamic mess after the successful "lead from behind" removal
of Muammar Gadhafi. Facts then had to change to fit a campaign narrative.
As the congressional hearings on Benghazi were taking
place last week, we also learned that the IRS, administered by the Department
of the Treasury, has been going after conservative groups in a politicized
manner that we have not seen since Richard Nixon's White House. There was no
evidence that any of these conservative associations had taken thousands of
dollars in improper tax deductions -- in the manner of former Treasury
Secretary Timothy Geithner, the one-time overseer of the IRS.
Instead, groups with suspiciously American names like
"Patriot" or "Tea Party" prompted IRS partisans to
scrutinize their tax information in a way that they would not have for the
tax-exempt MoveOn.org or the Obama-affiliated Organizing for Action. On top of
that, the Justice Department just announced that it had secretly seized the
records of calls from at least 20 work and private phone lines belonging to
editors and reporters at the Associated Press in efforts to stop suspected
leaks.
At about the same time as the Benghazi and IRS
disclosures, it was widely learned that there was a strange relationship
between the Obama White House and the very center of the American media -- odd
in a way that might explain the unusually favorable media coverage accorded
this administration.
Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security advisor for
strategic communications in the Obama administration, is linked to the
doctoring of the Benghazi talking points. He also happens to be the brother of
CBS News president David Rhodes. CBS recently pressured one of its top
reporters, Sharyl Attkisson, for "wading dangerously close to
advocacy," as one report worded it, in her critical reporting of Benghazi.
Unfortunately, such relationships are not rare with this
administration. The head of ABC News, Ben Sherwood, has a sister who works for
the Obama White House as a special assistant, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall.
And there is more. The CNN deputy bureau chief, Virginia
Moseley, is married to Hillary Clinton's former aide at the State Department,
Tom Nides, who is also a former Fannie Mae executive. Carney, Obama's press
secretary, is the husband of Claire Shipman, the senior national correspondent
for ABC's "Good Morning America."
Apparently, in the logic of the Obama White House and the
Washington media, there is nothing improper about wives dispassionately
reporting to the nation on what their husbands are doing, or brothers
adjudicating the news coverage of their own siblings.
Last month, the congressional architect of Obamacare,
Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) announced his plans to retire -- in part because he
feared his legislative child would become "a train wreck." Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid, who shepherded the bill toward passage, has echoed
that worry.
Democrats are panicking because before the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act is even fully implemented in the midterm
election year 2014, it appears neither affordable nor protective of patients.
That reality was long ago foreseeable -- given that Obamacare passed on a
strictly partisan vote, with a number of questionable legislative payoffs to
skeptical fence-sitting Democrats, and even after Speaker of the House Nancy
Pelosi, who helped ram the bill through the House, admitted that, "We have
to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it."
What is the common denominator in all these second-term
administration embarrassments? "Hope and change" is fast becoming the
1973 Nixon White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment