By Victor Davis Hanson
Thursday, March 21, 2013
For all the Obama-era talk of decline, there is at least
one reason why America probably won’t, at least not quite yet.
“Peak oil” and our “oil addiction” were supposed to have
ensured that we ran out of either gas or the money to buy it. Now, suddenly, we
have more gas and oil than ever before. But the key question is: Why do we?
The oil-and-gas renaissance was brought on by horizontal
drilling and fracking that opened up vast new reserves that were previously
either unknown or considered unrecoverable. Both technological breakthroughs
were American discoveries, largely brought on by entrepreneurial mavericks and
engineers exploring on mostly private lands. Couldn’t the Saudi, Venezuelan, or
Nigerian oil industry have discovered these new methods of resource recovery,
given their nations’ reliance on petroleum exportation?
The world now wakes up to iPhone communication, Amazon
online buying, social networking on Facebook, Google Internet searches, and
writing and computing with Microsoft software. Why weren’t these innovations
first developed in Japan, China, or Germany — all wealthy industrial countries
with large, well-educated, and hard-working populations? Because in such
nations, young oddballs like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, or Steve Jobs more likely would
have needed the proper parentage, age, family connections, or
government-insider sanction to be given a fair shake.
Even in its third century, America is still the most
meritocratic nation in the world. Unlike under the caste system of India; the
class considerations of Europe; the racial homogeneity of China, Japan, or
Korea; the tribalism of Africa; or the religious orthodoxy of the Middle East,
in America one can offer a new idea, invention, or protocol and have it be
judged on its merits, rather than on the background, accent, race, age, gender,
or religion of the person who offers it.
Businesses evaluate proposals on the basis of what makes
them lots of money. Publishers want writing that a lot of people will read.
Popular culture is simply a reflection of what the majority seems to want. In
the long run, that bottom line leads to national wealth and power.
If history is a guide, the most savvy Chinese citizen of
Japanese descent would not make it as a high official in Beijing’s Communist
Party — no more so than a brilliant Japanese citizen of Chinese descent would
run Toyota or Honda. A white Croatian of enormous talent could not end up as
president of Sudan.
Mexico has a word, Raza, that conflates race and
nationality, in the way that the German word Volk used to suggest not just
being German, but looking German, as well. I doubt that either country would
ever elect a black head of state.
It would be virtually impossible for the most talented
Christian or Jew to be allowed to head contemporary Egypt, or for a brilliant
four-star Buddhist general to run the Iranian military. For the immediate
future, don’t expect a female business-school valedictorian to manage Saudi
Arabia’s national oil company. Note that in all these cases, such exclusions derive
from criteria other than innate talent, character, and industriousness, and can
result in the lesser qualified being considered the only qualified.
The mixture of consumer capitalism and constitutionally
protected free speech — and all sorts of races, religions, and ethnicities —
sometimes means that America can be a wild place with a popular culture that
appears crass and uncouth to those abroad. Our generation’s $17 trillion
national debt, unfunded entitlements, and nearly 50 million people on food stamps
might convince the Founding Fathers that they had spawned license rather than
guaranteed liberty.
Yet the upside to the wild arena of America is that
almost anyone is free to enter it. Oprah Winfrey, an African-American woman,
reinvents the genre of daytime talk shows and builds a media empire. Warren
Buffet outpaces New York’s Wall Street — from Nebraska. A one-time
five-and-dime owner from Arkansas, Sam Walton, refashions the way an entire
planet buys its stuff. A Russian émigré, Sergey Brin, co-founds Google, perhaps
the most indispensible site on the Internet.
Just when we read obituaries about an unruly nation of
excess, unlikely nobodies pop up to pioneer fracking, the Napa wine industry,
or Silicon Valley. Why? No other nation has a Constitution whose natural
evolution would lead to a free, merit-based society that did not necessarily
look like the privileged — and brilliant — landed white-male aristocracy that
invented it.
The end of American exceptionalism will come not when we
run out of gas, wheat, or computers, but when we end the freedom of the
individual, and, whether for evil or supposedly noble reasons, judge people not
on their achievement but on their name, class, race, sex, or religion — in
other words, when we become like most places the world over.
No comments:
Post a Comment