By Douglas MacKinnon
Saturday, October 27, 2012
With many of the polls and much of the momentum trending
for Mitt Romney, much of the mainstream media is in full-panic mode as they
work overtime to tilt the "news" in favor of Barack Obama.
For a recent example of such bias, one need only look at
the October 25th edition of USA Today. On their front page was the headline:
"Economists see less pain in 2013."
Even while pushing such an Obama-friendly headline, their
own facts belie the trumped-up prediction. Of the 48 "economists"
surveyed, 83 percent said the economy will actually stay the same or get worse.
A percentage which would track with the beliefs of most Americans, who for the
first time in their lives, fear their children will have it worse than them.
Maybe instead of spinning dubious numbers and headlines
to benefit team Obama, the editors at USA Today might better serve their
readership by talking with various mayors, county officials, and governors to
hear how the corrupt public-employee unions are not only bankrupting their
budgets but literally robbing from the desperately poor and crumbling
infrastructures in the process.
Next, in this national paper on the same day we have not
one, but two major headlines about how Republicans are destroying their
election chances because they happen to be pro-life and their "opposition
to abortion rights for victims of rape and incest."
Like most of the liberal and compromised media, USA Today
chose to cherry-pick two controversial comments from Missouri senate candidate
Todd Akin and Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock (two men who could
still win by the way) and attempt to hang them around the neck of Mitt Romney
and the GOP.
No surprise there. As my former boss and friend Bob Dole
once told me: "If World War III were breaking out tomorrow, liberal
reporters would still ask Republicans about abortion."
From there, USA Today blares the headline: "Romney
skips entertainment TV."
Could that be because almost all of the shows and their
hosts are far-left and openly support Mr. Obama? Clearly either USA Today
thinks its readership fools or simply doesn’t care what they think as they
openly put their thumb on the scale for the president.
In the story, the USA Today "reporter" not only
seems to praise Mr. Obama for going on such shows as "The View,"
"Late Show with David Letterman," and "The Daily Show" with
Jon Stewart, but question the judgment of Mr. Romney for logically avoiding the
programs. Really?
As the reporter and her editors know, some of the hosts
of these programs -- such as David Letterman, Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, and
Jon Stewart -- have made no secret of their deep affection for Mr. Obama or
their distain for conservatives. On the far-left extreme you have the likes of
Mr. Letterman and Ms. Behar who seem to spew irrational hatred of
conservatives, the Tea Party, or the Republican party in general on a daily
basis. On the less extreme side of left-leaning hosts you have Jon Stewart and
Jay Leno who will at least take their team to task from time to time to make a
point or get a laugh.
Whether these hosts are far-left or simply liberal, most
Americans understand why Mr. Romney steers well clear of these shows. Just as they
understand why USA Today -- and most of the mainstream media -- is working so
hard to create a false issue.
Again, these examples are just from one edition of one
liberal newspaper on one day. A "newspaper" -- like ABC News, CBS
News, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, and a majority of the top newspapers -- which
bases much of its hiring not on qualifications or experience, but on political
correctness, diversity, and a liberal bias.
Knowing that, while understanding that these
"news" outlets will be unethically shaping their "news"
coverage to favor Mr. Obama until the last second, it's almost jaw-dropping to
realize what Mr. Romney is up against in the closing days of the election.
Fortunately, in large part because of this disgraceful
liberal bias, a majority of voters are going to send multiple messages by
electing Mr. Romney the next president of the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment