By Veronique de Rugy
Wednesday, April 02, 2025
Are you ready to be liberated from rising wages, massive
foreign direct investments, a growing economy, and friends worldwide?
Doug Holtz Eakin has a limerick for you:
There once was a man from
Mar-a-Lago
Who hated the idea of inbound
cargo
So he declared himself sheriff
And jacked up tariffs
Slowing us to recessionary tempo.
I realize that many of you think I don’t get it and that
the country was better off when manufacturing was a larger share of the economy
and more people worked in manufacturing plants. Even if those salaries were
lower, some of you believe that the change in the job landscape brought on by
modernity — including globalization — inexcusably hurt some individuals,
families, and communities.
My strong presumption is that such unfortunate outcomes
are the product of government interventions that make it more difficult for
workers to adjust to the economic changes that are inseparable from a market
economy. These interventions often mute the incentive to work or raise barriers
to people moving from where opportunities are declining to where opportunities
are rising.
But whether or not I’m correct on this front, it’s
undeniable that international trade isn’t remotely the only source of economic
change that “destroys” particular jobs as it creates others. As we’ve grown
richer, our demand for services has risen relative to our demand for goods. And
our technology, of course, has also advanced. Each of these forces, not trade,
is chiefly responsible for most of the losses in manufacturing employment.
Furthermore, while I think it is worthwhile to try to
help those communities in the downward throes of economic change, it is a
profound mistake to believe that the way to do it is to force a return to a
world that a vast majority of Americans would dislike if this world were
restored.
That said, here is a warning: Liberation Day and the
president’s overall tariff approach are about creating more manufacturing in
the U.S. at the expense of every other sector (which is more than four-fifths
of the economy). But considering the reality on the ground and how much
manufacturing today relies on trade to acquire low-cost inputs, expect Trump’s
tariffs to also exert a significant negative impact on manufacturing.
Oh, and I have a question for those of you who claim that
an easy and good way for Americans to avoid paying U.S. tariffs is to “buy
American” and produce more things here at home: If your town managed to impose
tariffs on groceries sold at your supermarket, would you think, “No problem! I
can escape these higher prices simply by raising my own chickens, growing my
own wheat, and manufacturing my own toilet tissue. I’ll have more employment
and be richer!”?
No comments:
Post a Comment