By Michael Brendan Dougherty
Wednesday, April 14, 2021
Back in the olden times, on the long-forgotten
show Saturday Night Live, which I presume was canceled decades ago
— no, I won’t check — comedian Dana Carvey had a recurring character, the
Church Lady. The character, an uptight talk-show host and moral busybody, was
hilarious, in part because she projected her consuming and lascivious
obsessions with sin and lust on her guests. “Some of us do our thinking below
the Bible Belt,” Church Lady sighed. And then she would land on the same
monocausal explanation for every wicked thing: “Could it
beeeee . . . Satan?!”
But the derangement of one obsession is not just for
pitiable televangelists. Freudianism, economics, Marxist theories of history’s
inevitable turns, all have become the single-cause explanation of every wicked
deed or act. But lately another obsession is taking over our intellectual
class. It explains every inequity in our society, and every unjust act. It’s
white supremacy.
Jennifer Ho, who has somehow overcome this omnipotent
force of oppression to become a professor at the University of Colorado-Boulder,
explains that even anti-Asian hatred is rooted in white supremacy, and that
white supremacy is to blame for attacks on Asians, even attacks by non-whites.
The point I’ve made through all of
those experiences is that anti-Asian racism has the same source as anti-Black
racism: white supremacy. So when a Black person attacks an Asian person, the
encounter is fueled perhaps by racism, but very specifically by white
supremacy. White supremacy does not require a white person to perpetuate it.
A black man attacks an Asian person. Could it be white
supremacy? Or the Latino man in Texas accused of stabbing a Burmese family in March 2020, claiming he did so because they were
Chinese and bringing the coronavirus into the U.S. Could that be white
supremacy? Yes it is.
Ho blames white supremacy for “a nearly 150% surge in
anti-Asian hate crimes in 2020” a figure reported by the Center for the Study
of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino. That
sounds like an unbelievable wave of hate and violence. But when you look at the
numbers, you see why the percentage is cited. In Los Angeles the number of
anti-Asian hate crimes reported rose from seven to 15. In New York, from three
to 28. In a city where tens of thousands died from COVID-19, made up of
millions of people, the number of anti-Asian hate crimes seems relatively
small. By contrast, in the previous year, 2019, over 1,000 anti-Semitic
incidents were reported in New York City.
It’s true that COVID-19 has brought anti-Asian sentiments
and bigotries to the fore. But it’s not a “white supremacist idea” to blame
China for the coronavirus. It’s also a Chinese idea. Taiwan still calls
COVID-19 the “Wuhan pneumonia,” and its leaders remain angry that Chinese
influence in the World Health Organization was used to exclude Taiwanese
scientists from giving their input during the early crucial stages of the
pandemic. This does not mean that Taiwan is in thrall to American’s history of
“yellow peril” fear mongering.
The theory becomes non-falsifiable. When a white person
commits an act of violence against a non-white person, it is white supremacy.
When reports are corrected and the perpetrator turns out to be a person of
color, the motive is still white supremacy. This obliterates not just the
agency of black and Hispanic criminals — recasting them as helpless automatons,
moved by a system that victimized them first — but much of the human
experience.
Ho says that white supremacy is the belief that
non-whites are less than human. That seems like a perfectly serviceable
definition. But Ho’s own belief in the mesmerizing influence of white supremacy
robs non-whites of their humanity as well. Ignorance, bigotry, fear, hatred,
and rage are all part of the human condition, and so too is our responsibility
for our actions. The members of the Black Hebrew Israelites who killed three
Jews in a grocery story in Jersey City in 2019 were not white supremacists,
were not acting on behalf of white supremacy — and saying so insults not only
the victims but the perpetrators.
This obsession becomes something like a political
Manichaeism, an ancient Christian heresy. Mani believed in a kind of equality
between Evil, which was associated with matter, and Good, which was spirit and
light. By casting Evil as undefeatable, and essentially inescapable, the task
of religion becomes a mere intellectual exercise. To be a Manichaean was to
understand this private mystery about the world. Mani was the first “woke.” And
his doctrine, which feeds both despair and intellectual arrogance, appealed to
exactly the class of people who wish to appear worldly and wise without making
sacrifices. It created a sophisticated religious system which, like Marxism or
modern political woke-ism, appeals to people precisely because knowledge separates
them not just from the hoi polloi, but is the best one can hope for against
moral pollution. Manichaeans produced a literate and sophisticated religious
system around the one mystery that substituted as an explanation for
everything.
This political Manichaeism around white supremacy has
many fathers, but its great recent popularizer was Ta-Nehisi Coates. In his
book, Between the World and Me, Coates makes white supremacy the
great shaper of the world and proves his faith in it the same way Jennifer Ho
does, by casting it as the prime motivating force in an act of violence of one
black police officer, on another young black man. The book recasts the
acceptance of the inescapable nature of white supremacy as its own form of
rebellion.
But this is an inert faith. It cultivates contempt even
for the people it claims to wish to liberate. Ultimately, it is a form of
despair.
No comments:
Post a Comment