By John Loftus
Tuesday, October 27, 2020
‘Democrats see a political system increasingly rigged
against them and the voters they represent,” Ezra Klein opines in his latest Vox
piece,
“and they are right.”
Klein goes on to make several erroneous claims as he
outlines (what he thinks) are the stakes in the 2020 presidential election and
airs his complaints about election outcomes and proper constitutional
procedure.
First, in decrying the structure of the Electoral
College and Senate,
Klein conveniently ignores the fact that the United States is not a direct
democracy, nor was it intended to be one. That Klein ignores this while making
a sweeping assertion about the U.S. “political system” weakens his
already-shoddy case. Why exactly is the Electoral College illegitimate or
anti-democratic? Is it that the Electoral College is unconstitutional, or that
the Democrats sometimes win the popular vote but lose the Electoral College,
and therefore lose elections? Is it unconstitutional for states to decide their
own voter-ID laws? And if some citizens do not register to vote under revised
state laws, does that mean they are being suppressed by the fascist bogeyman?
Or is the onus on the citizen?
The second erroneous claim is that Senator Mike Lee (R.,
Utah) spoke for the entire Republican Party when he tweeted, “Democracy isn’t
the objective; liberty, peace, and prosperity are. We want the human condition
to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.” Klein writes, rather
dramatically, “Rank democracy. There is no subtext in this election,
only text; no dog whistles, only foghorns. Lee, a former Supreme Court clerk
and one of the GOP’s brighter intellectual lights, is stating his party’s
position simply: Democracy is the enemy, the specter stalking Republican
power.” This simply isn’t true. Just as one would not assume that Senator Ed
Markey (D., Mass.) speaks for the entire Democratic Party when he tweets,
rather stupidly, “Originalism is just a fancy word for discrimination,” Ezra
Klein should not assume that all Republicans believe democracy is the enemy —
whatever that means. (Further, David Harsanyi writes compellingly here
about how Lee’s tweet was taken out of context.)
Klein’s partisanship is again on full display when he
discusses the pitfalls of mail-in ballots and voter fraud. “What if Trump
wins,” he posits, “but only because shocking numbers of mail-in ballots sent by
Democratic voters were thrown out?” Klein concedes that, indeed, voter fraud is
not only possible but ought to be a legitimate concern for Democrats. But if a
Republican raises this concern . . . well, then, it
becomes a conspiracy theory that
undermines democratic norms. Such is the nature of Klein’s position.
Everything that can be framed as harming Democrats is an issue. If it does not
harm, or if it benefits, Democrats, it is in fact not an issue or an impediment
to achieving direct democracy in America.
Had Hillary Clinton won the presidential election in
2016, it’s doubtful Klein would think the “political system” is rigged. Only
when the results of elections do not align with his preferences does the
“political system” become rigged, and suddenly, democracy is at stake. It seems
that when Republicans play by constitutional procedure and achieve their
desired outcomes — e.g., the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett — Ezra
Klein thinks that the procedure ought to be radically reformed, consequences be
damned.
No comments:
Post a Comment