By Jim Geraghty
Friday, December 27, 2019
You may recall that back in March 2017, MSNBC host Rachel
Maddow shocked the world by declaring “we’ve got Trump’s tax returns!” Then she
later clarified she had obtained Donald Trump’s 1040 form from … 2005. Those
who tuned in to her program that evening had to watch a meandering 19-minute
soliloquy and a commercial break before Maddow showed anything from the tax
return, which wasn’t much. Her guest, David Cay Johnson, speculated that Trump
may have also leaked nude photos of Melania.
That night was a massive letdown for those who believed
Maddow’s initial announcement, but it previewed what we could expect from
Maddow for the next three years, as the Washington Post’s Erik Wemple lays
out in exhaustive detail in a review of Maddow’s reporting and discussion
of the Steele dossier. His assessment is scathing:
When small bits of news arose in
favor of the dossier, the franchise MSNBC host pumped air into them. At least
some of her many fans surely came away from her broadcasts thinking the dossier
was a serious piece of investigative research, not the flimflam, quick-twitch
game of telephone outlined in the Horowitz report. She seemed to be rooting for
the document.
And when large bits of news arose
against the dossier, Maddow found other topics more compelling.
She was there for the bunkings,
absent for the debunkings — a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry.
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz
issued his report earlier this month and concluded, “much of the material in
the Steele election reports, including allegations about Donald Trump and
members of the Trump campaign relied upon in the Carter Page FISA applications,
could not be corroborated; that certain allegations were inaccurate or
inconsistent with information gathered by the Crossfire Hurricane team; and
that the limited information that was corroborated related to time, location
and title information, much of which was publicly available.”
The night Horowitz released his report, Maddow ignored
that and emphasized other conclusions: “The inspector general debunks that there
was any anti-Trump political bias motivating these decisions. They debunked the
idea that the Christopher Steele dossier of opposition research against Trump
was the basis for opening the FBI’s Russia investigation.”
Wemple writes: “Asked to comment on how she approached
the dossier, Maddow declined to provide an on-the-record response.”
Like other prime-time cable news hosts who receive much
more criticism, Maddow shows up every weeknight and tells a devoted audience,
“the world is as you want it to be.” Trump is the worst, he’s committed many
terrible crimes, a reckoning is coming, we will be vindicated. Her audience
is not interested in hearing the host or guests declare: “While we are
vehemently opposed to Trump, but there is no evidence he’s being blackmailed or
controlled by the Russian government.” Her program includes bits of news and
other substances that appear to be like news, but are not — fervent
speculation, conjecture, assumptions, theories. If it is too harsh to call it
“fake news,” then it is news with artificial flavors and sweeteners, designed
to make it more exciting and appealing than it really is.
No comments:
Post a Comment