By Kevin D. Williamson
Sunday, December 15, 2019
Some copy-editor at the New York Times has a sense of humor.
“The president and his allies have turned investigations
into a political tool for use against their enemies,” reads the headline over a
“news analysis” by James B. Stewart.
Well.
The Democrats began publicly laying the foundation for
impeaching Donald Trump before he was sworn in as president, the FBI under the
Obama administration used counterintelligence powers to investigate the rival
party’s presidential campaign and falsified evidence to get permission to
continue the investigation, etc., but when Trump et al. point out that the
inspector general has found serious misconduct on the part of the FBI, it’s “The
president and his allies have turned investigations into a political tool to
use against their enemies.” It’s the new “Republicans Pounce!” headline.
I do not think that you would need to be an admirer of
President Trump or a partisan Republican (I am neither) to understand, as all
mentally normal people do, that the impeachment itself is the trophy example of
a weaponized investigation being used for political purposes. You can even
believe that the president should be impeached and removed from office and
understand that. Because that is the obvious truth. There isn’t anybody who
does not know that, even though there are many people who cannot, for
professional or psychological reasons, admit it.
In the now-forgotten days of October 2016, the great
rhetorical demand among Democrats was that Donald Trump and Republicans promise
that they would “accept the results of the election.” This was always a little
mystifying, inasmuch as it raised the question of what they might do instead —
raise an army? But that rhetoric was premised on the assumption that the
Republican candidate was going to lose in 2016. Since then, it has been
Democrats who have steadfastly refused to accept the results of the 2016
election. The hyperbole about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential
election (settle down, you mouth-breathers — it is possible for something to be
both real and exaggerated at the same time) is part of that. The impeachment is
part of that. The years-long campaign to establish a pretext for impeachment
was part of that. (Emoluments, indeed.) Michelle Goldberg’s bizarre
politics-as-group-therapy (“Democracy
Grief Is Real,” etc.) is part of that. So is “Resistance!” and the risible
insistence that Donald Trump is the worst thing since Adolf Hitler.
My own belief is that the Republican party was wrong to
nominate Donald Trump in 2016 and that he has no business being president of
these United States. But that is how the election went. And the fact that your
dotty old grandmother saw a couple of silly Russkie posts on Facebook does not
change that. The votes were the votes. There is no serious dispute about that,
but Democrats nonetheless reject the legitimacy of the election . . . just as
they refused to accept the results of the last
presidential election a Republican won.
(A pattern emerges . . . .)
It is the Democrats who are willing to undermine our
institutions — accepting the incompetence and corruption at the FBI, IRS, NLRB,
and more while pouring scorn on the efforts of inspectors general to address
such incompetence and corruption. It is the Democrats who are bent on
delegitimizing the Supreme Court now that they no longer believe that they can
count on it to give them the political outcomes they fail to achieve through
elections and legislation. It is the Democrats who now insist that
evidence-free accusations are sufficient grounds to disqualify nominees for
federal office, that universities and employers should be deputized to enforce
political conformism and homogeneity, etc. Does anybody really think the
Democrats would be leaning on Facebook if Hillary Rodham Clinton had been
victorious in 2016?
You know better. You really do.
“The president and his allies have turned investigations
into a political tool for use against their enemies.” Okay, Sparky. New York
Democrats just had to be stopped by the courts from abusing their prosecutorial
powers to punish Exxon for having naughty views on climate change, pretending
that this political jihad was a securities-fraud case. Garrett Graff over at
CNN wants Fox News to be treated as a threat
to national security. You think Kamala Harris as attorney general in
California was using her prosecutorial powers to go after conservative
nonprofits’ donor lists because she was looking for pickpockets and jaywalkers?
Or was it because she wanted to use investigations as a political tool for use
against her enemies?
“Enemies.”
Maybe think a little harder about those headlines. Maybe
question the assumptions underlying them.
And maybe spare us your tedious, lying sanctimony.
No comments:
Post a Comment