Thursday, May 24, 2012
Cory Booker is, by most accounts, a reasonable man. He
went to Stanford and Oxford, as well as Yale Law School; now he's the mayor of
Newark. He's also African-American.
That last fact is only important because liberals have
made it so.
Booker has been a strong backer of President Obama -- so
strong, in fact, that in 2009, Obama offered him a slot in his administration
as head of the Office of Urban Affairs Policy. Booker turned it down on the
grounds that he wanted to fulfill his job as mayor.
That should have been the end of the story. Obama and
Booker should have remained friends. Instead, President Obama's desperation to
beat Mitt Romney into the ground led Obama to attack Romney's record at Bain
Capital, over and over again. On NBC, Booker, who the Obama campaign trotted
out as their "surrogate," made the mistake of telling the truth. When
asked about Obama's attacks on Bain Capital, he was honest enough to rip the
tactic: "I live in a state where pension funds, union and other people are
investing in companies like Bain Capital. If you look at the totality of Bain
Capital's record, they've done a lot to support business, to grow business, and
this, to me, I'm very uncomfortable with. ... This kind of stuff is nauseating
to me on both sides. It's nauseating to the American public. Enough is enough.
Stop attacking private equity."
This put Booker right in the firing line of the left. It
was one thing for an Obama surrogate to go off-message -- Obama surrogates from
Joe Biden to Hilary Rosen have done it repeatedly. It was another thing for an
African-American Obama supporter to go off-message.
The White House was fuming mad -- so mad that the
Democratic National Committee called up Booker to chew him out. Meanwhile,
spokespeople for the Obama campaign appeared on television to assure the public
that no such action was taking place. Republicans quickly cut an ad showing the
Obama campaign lying about putting pressure on Booker.
Booker, properly chastised, quickly backed down. He cut a
video on YouTube kissing President Obama's ring; he took to Twitter to send
missive after missive about how he supported Obama. He suddenly reversed
himself, explaining that Romney was running as a businessman, so Obama should
attack Romney's record. He even said he was "upset I'm being used by the
GOP this way."
Let's stop and consider for a minute. After Booker made
his remarks on "Meet the Press," prominent Democrats including former
Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and
Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., all backed him up. But they didn't receive anywhere
near the same kind of scrutiny Booker did. Why? The obvious answer is that they
are all white, while Booker is black. It is one thing for a white Democrat to
disagree with Obama on anything; for a black American to disagree with
President Obama is akin to treason.
That perverse political truism explains President Obama's
embrace of same-sex marriage. The National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People came out this week in support of same-sex marriage, even calling
it a civil rights issue -- even though just 39 percent of black Americans
support same-sex marriage. Why have major institutional black organizations
come out in support of President Obama's policy? Because they feel that racial
loyalty will overcome ideological diversity.
Even worse, while groups like the NAACP demand
ideological conformity from black Americans, so do white liberals such as Chris
Matthews, who said that Booker had engaged in an "act of sabotage," a
"betrayal." The truth is that during the "Meet the Press"
interview, Booker gushed over Obama's economic policy and endorsed him multiple
times. So that simply wasn't true. But straying from the Obama path is
verboten, even for black liberals.
Booker's race shouldn't be important to this story.
There's only one reason it is: Liberals want to use race as a litmus test for
ideology. And that is deeply bigoted.
No comments:
Post a Comment