Tuesday, May 29, 2012
After several cries of pain from my 16-year-old son, I
finally got around to reading his Advanced Placement world history textbook.
Not a way to spend a placid weekend.
Paging through the "World Civilizations: The Global
Experience" by Peter N. Stearns et al. is flabbergasting. The authors lean
so far backward to be neutral about various cultures and nations that the text
fails utterly as reliable history.
In the wake of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the
collapse of the Soviet Union -- with all of the copious records that have been
exhumed from the Soviet archives and other sources -- one might have thought
that the sheer human catastrophe caused by communism ought no longer to be in
question among serious people, far less eminent historians. (Actually, there
has been no doubt since the 1930s, but the evidence has become even more
voluminous since 1989.) Yet throughout this 900-plus-page tome, the brutal body
count of communism's victims is given only glancing notice. Like Soviet
apologists during the Cold War era, the authors provide generous
interpretations of communist dictators motives, along with dry, forgettable
descriptions of their atrocities.
"World Civilizations" tells some of our most
advanced 10th graders that Josef Stalin's collectivization of agriculture
"had serious flaws." That's one way of describing a deliberate policy
of starving the peasantry into submission. In "Harvest of Sorrow,"
Robert Conquest estimated that the "terror famine" of 1932-33 caused
the deaths of at least five million Ukrainians, and Stalin's agriculture
collectivization, which included the war on "kulaks," (slightly more
prosperous peasants) took the lives of 14.5 million people in all.
You won't find those deaths mentioned in "World
Civilizations." No, the text instructs students that "after the messy
transition period" had ended, "the collective farms did ... allow
normally adequate if minimal food supplies ... and they did free excess workers
to be channeled into the ranks of urban labor."
Later, "World Civilizations" mentions that
Stalin's totalitarian regime resulted in one of the "great bloodbaths of
the 20th century." But the very next sentence misleads the reader
completely. "During the great purge of party leaders that culminated in
1937-38, hundreds of people were intimidated into confessing imaginary crimes
against the state and most of them were put to death. Many thousands more were
sent to Siberian labor camps."
Hundreds? Thousands? The Black Book of Communism,
published in 1999, estimated that the USSR was responsible for 20 million
deaths (this is exclusive of the losses in World War II). More recent estimates
have put the total far higher. By mentioning the bloodbath but then immediately
citing examples involving only hundreds killed and thousands imprisoned, the
text distorts the historical record almost beyond recognition.
Mao Zedong, perhaps the greatest butcher of the 20th
century in terms of sheer numbers, is treated as a tarnished idealist -- one
who "clung to his faith in the peasants ... as the repository of basic
virtue." Mao's Communists, reads the text, were aided in their rise to
power by World War II. But they "won the mandate to govern China because
they offered solutions to China's fundamental social and economic problems."
The Communists seized power in China though violence and
terror -- just the same way communists achieved power everywhere else in the
world. Was there an election in which the Chinese endorsed the Communists'
"solutions" to China's problems? Of course not. As for Mao's faith in
the peasants -- God protect us from such faith. Mao presided over the worst
famine in recorded history -- estimates of the number killed range between 20
and 43 million. The famine grew directly out of Mao's Great Leap Forward -- a
series of dictates that included farm collectivization and applying the
crackpot genetic theories of Stalin's favorite "scientist" Trofim
Lysenko. Mao, like Stalin, also used famine as a political tool to eliminate
his adversaries.
"World Civilizations" baldly endorses the
notion that communist central planning was successful in modernizing the
economies of the USSR and China. As Martin Malia wrote in "The Soviet
Tragedy," Stalin's Five Year Plan was "the culmination of the most
precipitous peacetime decline in living standards known in recorded
history."
There is much more along these lines. The Hitler/Stalin
Pact was the fault of Britain and France. Castro was an impatient reformer.
It's quite staggering that this long-since discredited benevolence about communism
is being offered in the 21st century. Our kids would be far better served
learning from Wikipedia.
No comments:
Post a Comment