By Kevin D. Williamson
Saturday, February 16, 2019
I do not think that Kara Swisher of the New York Times is stupid, and that is
what makes it remarkable that she can write this sort of thing:
. . . the dulcet attractions of
tech have lost their charm for many and that the business — which has been this
country’s most innovative and promising and often its most inspirational — is
just that: a business, like any other, out for itself and itself alone, and
most definitely not changing the world for the better.
That was the cry of tech from its
start — especially of the internet types like the Amazon head, Jeff Bezos.
Bankers never said they were going to make the world a better place. Nor did
makers of toilet paper or potato chips.
(No, I do not think “dulcet” is quite the right word
there.)
But of course the makers of toilet paper do make the
world a better place, by making it a place in which Kara Swisher of the New York Times does not have to
manufacture her own toilet paper. Always ask the necessary question: “Compared
to what?”
Her column is headlined: “Amazon isn’t interested in
making the world a better place.” Of course Amazon makes the world a better
place — that is its business model, and the business model of most successful
businesses. That is why people give Amazon their money.
Swisher’s column reminded me of a speech I saw Louis
Farrakhan give many years ago, in which he spoke of the need for African
Americans to become economically independent of the white devil. “It will be a
brown day in America if white people ever decide to stop making toilet paper
for us!” he thundered. But his observation in fact proved the opposite of the
point he was trying to make: Henry Ford, like Louis Farrakhan and some of the
minister’s friends newly installed in the U.S. House of Representatives, was a
pretty nasty anti-Semite, but that never stopped him from building a car for a
Jew, and never stopped Jewish people from benefiting from his innovations.
Presumably, there are proportionally about as many racists in the management of
American corporations as there are in the general public, but whatever backward
views they may hold rarely stand in the way of business. “Not from the
benevolence of the butcher or the baker,” etc.
When conservatives talk about “capitalism,” we tend to
emphasize its competitive nature. But market competition is only a means to the
greater end of human cooperation,
which, thanks to the inexplicably hated forces of globalization and the
purportedly greed-headed innovations of companies such as Amazon, is now being
undertaken on a worldwide scale nearly unimaginable only a generation ago. The
miracle of capitalism in the early 21st century is not primarily technological
but social, as nifty as the gadgetry
is. It is a miracle that no one seems to appreciate, or even to like very much,
with the possible exception of the billion or so people who get to eat more
regularly as a result of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment