By Kevin D. Williamson
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
The debate over fracking is a pretty low-quality one,
driven by emotion, invented evidence, gross distortion of the facts, and
general intellectual dishonesty. This is a shame for many reasons: Inflicting
unnecessary stupidity on the world is a sin, for one thing. For another, it is
important that we actually understand the fairly thorny environmental problems
presented not only by fracking but by other methods of drilling for natural
gas.
A paper published Monday by the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences presents very strong evidence that the
contamination of drinking water in wells in Texas and Pennsylvania was not the
result of fracking. But the wells were nonetheless contaminated. The culprit
was not the hydraulic-fracturing process, but simple bad well design, resulting
in leaks. This is an example of something well-known both to energy industry
experts and regulators: Conventional gas drilling presents as many
environmental challenges as, and arguably more than, fracking does.
The biggest environmental problem associated with
fracking has little to do with the drilling process itself and much more to do
with the comparatively unsexy issue of wastewater disposal. (If you’re jazzed
about the possibility of a very long discussion of wastewater-disposal issues,
don’t say I never did anything for you.) For an unconscionably long time, the
industry’s practice was to hand over its wastewater to municipal water
authorities, most of which were ill-equipped to deal with it; they simply
diluted it until such a point as the letter of the law was satisfied and then
dumped it. The anti-fracking crusaders worry a great deal about what goes down
the well — the precise composition of fracking fluids — but the bigger problem
is what comes up the well. Drilling that deep underground means pulling up all
sorts of stuff, ranging from arsenic and some fairly nasty carcinogens to
naturally occurring radioactive material. Not stuff you want to dump in the
river.
The gas producers have begun addressing that by treating
and reusing wastewater, and an entire fascinating mini-industry has grown up
around that practice. The gas industry’s best-practices leaders are in fact
extraordinarily proactive in mitigating environmental damage, and trade groups
such as the Marcellus Shale Coalition have done remarkable work encouraging
their members to go above and beyond what the law requires. But not every
company is a leader, and best practices are not universal practices.
The distribution of natural gas and water underground is
a complicated issue. In the Pennsylvania and Texas wells studied for the PNAS
paper, the problem was well damage and well design. In the famous flaming-sink
scene from Gasland, the problem was that the water well had been sunk into a
naturally occurring pocket of methane; gas production, to say nothing of
fracking, had nothing to do with that striking image, which is very effective
propaganda but bad science. There is a great deal of naturally occurring
methane in bodies of water around the world and goes back to ancient history —
to pre-history, in fact. Note the number of places named “Burning Springs” or
some variant around the world.
Every discussion of the environmental issues related to
energy should begin with an appreciation for this indisputable fact: There is
no energy source that does not present serious environmental challenges. Oil
and gas have their problems, coal has what seem to me to be very serious
problems, nuclear energy (which I strongly favor) presents some pretty hairy
disposal challenges and safety concerns. Even the fuzzy, cuddly energy sources
have problems: It takes a tremendous amount of poison to make those “green”
solar panels. The general hideousness of wind farms requires no explanation.
The question isn’t “clean” energy. There is no clean energy.
The question is how we go about prudently and intelligently managing the risks
and problems associated with energy production. Posting pictures of flaming
sinks on your Facebook page is not the way to go about understanding those
problems. This is a discussion best left to the grown-ups, but the children
have the floor most of the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment