By John Fund
Monday, September 17, 2012
The stern photo of revolutionary Che Guevara taken by
Alberto Korda in 1960 is one of the most reproduced images on the planet,
appearing on posters, flags, postcards, T-shirts, and even bikinis. Sadly, the
ubiquitous appearances of Che — hailed today usually by his first name only —
demonstrate the near-total failure to educate people about the blood-soaked
cruelty he really represented.
But there are, thankfully, some limits to the use of
Che’s famous image — if people complain. A recent e-mail sent by the
Environmental Protection Agency to mark Hispanic Heritage Month included
Korda’s image of Che along with the slogan “Hasta la victoria siempre,” or “On
to victory, always.” After facing criticism, the EPA said the e-mail had been
“drafted and sent by an individual employee, and without official clearance.”
Nonetheless, it’s unsettling to see Che’s image
appropriated by a government agency that has a notorious reputation for
violating property rights and imposing arbitrary controls on growth. Just last
March, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that an Idaho couple seeking to
build on their land had their rights violated when the EPA imposed fines of
$75,000 a day without giving the couple the ability to challenge its rulings.
Also this year, the EPA regional administrator Al
Armendariz was forced to resign after he described his enforcement philosophy
in a public speech: “Find people who are not complying with the law and you hit
them as hard as you can and make examples of them.” He compared the tactic to
that used by ancient Roman soldiers: “The Romans used to conquer little
villages in the Mediterranean. They’d go into a little Turkish town somewhere,
they’d find the first five guys they saw, and they would crucify them. And then
you know that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.”
That sounds a lot like how Che operated. After Fidel
Castro seized power in 1959, Che was instrumental in setting up forced-labor
camps for dissidents, gays, and devout Catholics. He was put in charge of La
Cabaña Fortress prison for five months. There are varying accounts of how many
people were executed under his command during that time, and how many deaths are
attributed directly to Che as opposed to the regime overall, but some sources
say that more than 100 journalists, businessmen, and followers of the previous
regime faced death by firing squad at La Cabaña, under Che’s jurisdiction.
Violence was at the core of Che’s philosophy. Shortly
before his death at the hands of Bolivian troops in 1967, he wrote “Message to
the Tricontinental.” In this essay he advocated the effective use of violent
hatred:
Hatred as an element of the struggle; a relentless hatred of the enemy, impelling us over and beyond the natural limitations that man is heir to and transforming him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold killing machine. Our soldiers must be thus; a people without hatred cannot vanquish a brutal enemy.
A decade earlier, when he murdered Eutimio Guerra, he
recorded in his diary: “I ended the problem with a .32 caliber pistol, in the
right side of his brain. . . . His belongings were now mine.”
Nor was Che’s violence directed only against Cubans.
Author Humberto Fontova points to evidence that Guevara, the chief instigator
of Castro’s revolutionary efforts overseas, was involved in a November 1962
terrorist plot to use 1,200 pounds of TNT to blow up Macy’s, Gimbels,
Bloomingdale’s, and Grand Central Station on the day after Thanksgiving, the
busiest shopping day of the year. Such an act could have rivaled 9/11 in its
destruction. This is hardly a man who deserves to be honored as a hero on T-shirts.
The Obama administration deserves credit for distancing
itself from the EPA’s flirtation with Che. But Obama acolytes haven’t always
been so sensible. During the 2008 campaign, a Houston TV station taped the
inside of an Obama get-out-the-vote office that featured a large Cuban flag on
the wall, with the image of Che stamped onto it.
The spokeswoman for the Obama office who sat down with
the TV station for an interview repeatedly called questions about the Cuban
flag “a distraction” and a “waste of time” and said, “I don’t have time to talk
about the Cuban flag.” Or Che, for that matter.
But it’s time we start to talk about Che. He may have
died 45 years ago, but his pernicious philosophy is still very much under
debate in Latin America. On the one hand, even liberals such as Rory Carroll,
the Latin American correspondent for the Guardian in Britain, acknowledge that
the Cuban model would have been a “debacle” if exported to other countries. “To
challenge the U.S. empire, Che dreamed of creating ‘many Vietnams,’ not least
in his Argentine homeland,” Carroll wrote. “Who today can seriously wish he had
succeeded? . . . Who needs Che?”
But while overt Communism isn’t on the march in Latin
America, Che-style thinking is ascendant in the anti-American authoritarians
who today rule Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Nicaragua. Che is much more
than an image on a T-shirt to leaders in those countries: He is an inspiration
on how to seize and maintain power. It’s for that reason that we should push
back whenever and wherever Che’s image surfaces. If people wore T-shirts with
images of Nazi butchers, most of us wouldn’t let them pass by without comment.
The same should be the case with Che, whether his image shows up on college
campuses or in EPA e-mails.
No comments:
Post a Comment