By Christian Schneider
Thursday, October 02, 2025
Earlier this week, the New York Times published a glossy feature on Laurie Cooper, a
seasoned socialite and “influencer” who is urging women to engage in a risky
strategy to meet potential mates. She is telling them to go to bars.
Cooper dubbed this month “Sit at the Bar September,”
figuring it would be a better alternative for women than endlessly scrolling
through men on dating apps.
“A vast majority of us just haven’t had the confidence to
execute it,” Mikaela Phillips, 28, a producer in Los Angeles, told the Times.
“Now it’s become acceptable: Head out and give this a shot. Hopefully the men
are catching on and open to it just as much.”
Of course, for many men, “Sit at the Bar September” is
known by its more common name, “September.” It is impossible to contemplate the
fortunes bars have spent over the past few decades trying to lure women to
their stools. Owners know promotions like “ladies’ night” bring the women to
their establishments. And yet it took a recommendation by a veteran bar-goer to
actually (reportedly) make it happen. (The article doesn’t say how many trips
around the sun Cooper has experienced, but it is clear she would have been more
Team Robert Redford than Team Harry Styles.)
The Times’ story is newsworthy only because in
silly eras, common sense passes for innovation. Over the past 25 years, the
online world has promised to simplify the dating process, with algorithms
linking like-minded people without requiring them to do oppressive things such
as leaving the house.
But even with today’s artificial intelligence, nobody
really knows what attracts people to each other. Not everyone wants to date
someone exactly like themselves. The heart wants what it wants; the world needs
to be open to such unlikely matches as, say, a loudmouthed, philandering,
chubby, spray-tanned real estate developer and an aloof, high-cheek-boned,
Slovenian supermodel decades his junior. Miracles do happen!
Yet, on an almost daily basis, we are having to relearn
lessons forged by humans over centuries of interaction and experience. Example:
For years now, students have been outsourcing their essays to ChatGPT or its AI
cousins, producing immaculate five-paragraph manifestos on topics they barely
understand. Teachers are catching on, and some schools are reemphasizing the
radical idea of writing things down on paper with a pencil. This, too, is
something we used to know — that learning isn’t just about the final product
but about the messy process of thinking, erasing, rewriting, and getting a hand
cramp. (And should be done in school without the constant distraction of
cellphones, another obvious lesson we are still only beginning to process.)
During the Covid era — itself a lesson in relearning our
powerlessness in the face of nature — Americans immediately resorted to
old-timey, tried-and-true hobbies to kill time. People were clandestinely
buying yeast from dealers on street corners in order to make sourdough bread.
Sales of books spiked. More people started writing journals and working on
puzzles. (I even bought a bicycle, which a major national publication decided
should be worldwide news.)
Even today, though, America remains very much in the “FO”
part of the “FAFO” formulation, despite centuries of experience that should
have helped us avoid our current plight. No “FA” was necessary to contemplate
the consequences, for instance, of the government pumping trillions of dollars
into the economy just as it was roaring back from the Covid downturn. The
simplest of analyses and centuries of examples taught us that dousing the
economy with cash, as if it were a World Series winner being sprayed with
Champagne, would overheat the markets and lead to inflation.
We knew that escalating tariffs would keep that inflation
high, as already overstretched American consumers would be saddled with paying
the new import taxes. And yet President Kool-Aid Man decided to ignore
virtually every economic analysis and crashed through the tariff wall, using it
as a bargaining chip, which few trade partners have decided to cash in on. As
an economist who specializes in red, sugary, powdered drinks might say, OH,
NOOOOOO!
The Trump era has compelled us to reexamine a significant
number of ideas and concepts we once believed to be settled. For instance, the
Founding Fathers implemented a First Amendment for a reason — to prevent
government retaliation for speech a thin-skinned president may not like. We
have had to reassert the plainly spelled-out right to birthright citizenship
found in the 14th Amendment. For some reason, we have had to convince people
all over again that vaccines save lives and that pregnant women can safely take
Tylenol, as their doctors have long told them.
This is what makes the modern era of conservatism so
disappointing. We are the ones who have learned the lessons from history and
demand that courts apply the law as it was meant when written. We are the ones
who believe in a society formed by tradition. We are the ones who have demanded
serious presidents who didn’t behave like a drumming
Muppet. Republicans were once the reflective and resolute ones, but the
party of small government is now shepherded by a leader who will
enthusiastically use powers he does not actually possess to meddle in matters
large and small, from the military to Taylor
Swift’s hotness.
In the past, the need to relearn fundamental lessons has
been the bailiwick of progressivism, whose charge has been to straighten
Immanuel Kant’s “crooked timber of humanity,” whether humanity asks for it or
not. Progressives believe that human nature can be suppressed to create a new
version of women and men who identify themselves in terms of groups rather than
as individuals, in contradiction of virtually every uprising staged by
freedom-loving people looking to escape the boot heel of government.
Consequently, the progressive experience has taken a
beating in recent years. Leftists are learning that people want to live in
cities that haven’t been overrun by homeless drug addicts. They are figuring
out that using taxpayer money for prisoner “gender-reassignment” surgeries and
allowing surgeons to mutilate the bodies of children who’ve been told they can
change genders might not be a big political winner. They are beginning to
realize that handing the Democratic Party over to their most virulent culture
warriors has repelled middle America. In Donald Rumsfeldian nomenclature, these
have always been “known knowns.”
So what’s going on here? Partly it’s arrogance. Every new
generation believes that it’s smarter than the ones before it. Partly it’s
convenience: apps are easier than awkward conversations, and having AI write
papers for you is a real time-saver. And partly it’s just human nature.
Forgetting and relearning is how we stumble forward, mistaking rediscovery for
progress.
So as we watch young men and women nervously attempt eye
contact at bars again, or students scratch out essays with pencils, or a
president run up against the First Amendment, maybe we should take comfort.
Yes, it’s frustrating to keep relearning the obvious. But it also means the
cycle works: we do remember, eventually. Civilization survives on these little
rediscoveries.
No comments:
Post a Comment