By Noah Rothman
Tuesday, December 16, 2025
Jennifer Welch, the one-time Bravo reality television
star who has set out to prove what cheap dates progressive podcast listeners
really are (and has so far succeeded), is at it again. As Jim recently highlighted, the left-wing provocateur has
been the recipient of glowing treatments in legacy media venues, one of which
praised her ability to engineer paradigmatic shifts in how the country thinks
about politics. But as is so often the case among the alt-talker set, the
podcaster might have mistaken the crowd she draws while making a spectacle of
herself for impassioned supporters.
In a recent diatribe alongside former CNN host Don Lemon, the
reliably manic Welsh became visibly perturbed by the late Charlie Kirk’s
widow’s media tour in her effort to promote her husband’s final book, which hit
the shelves on December 9. In a reaction to CBS News editor-in-chief Bari
Weiss’s contention that some of Kirk’s critics excused his murder, Welch
indignantly claimed that she didn’t know “anyone who justified his death”
before she did just that.
“The person that I heard that justified his death was
him,” the podcaster continued. “He’s the one that said on tape that if school
kids die, but it means he gets to have a Second Amendment, then that’s – that’s
what it’s gonna be. He’s the one that justified it.”
Welch went further than that: “I believe at the time of
shooting,” she mused, “he was talking about gun violence at the time.”
Indeed, he was. The very last question Kirk was asked was
posed by a student interlocutor who asked, “Do you know how many mass shooters
there have been in America over the last ten years?” Within seconds of that
question being asked, Kirk was struck by a 30.06-caliber bullet allegedly fired
by a far-left progressive in a relationship with a trans-identifying male – one
of several recent acts of political violence committed by figures who
are themselves trans or adjacent to the movement.
Perhaps Welch is so genuinely ignorant of the current
events on which she regularly opines that she is authentically unaware of the dozens of left-wing figures who either welcomed Kirk’s
killing as a righteous comeuppance or excused it as the fruits of his own
labors. Maybe she thought pretending to be ignorant of that phenomenon would
help her make a point about gun violence that inadvertently cast Kirk as better
informed on the subject of modern acts of mass violence. Either way, Welch made
a fool of herself.
Not that faceplants like these are bad for her personal
brand. Even if you’re wrong – even if you’re knowingly wrong – the
incentives in the alternative podcast landscape reward bombast and braggadocio
as much as they discourage humility and circumspection. This episode is worthy
of study only as it relates to what progressive audiences want. And despite the
best efforts of the Democratic political class to gently nudge activists away
from the performative self-righteousness of the resistance-era left, what they
want is the fight for fight’s sake.
There will be those who insist that Welch is unworthy of
scrutiny – that she only generates the attention she’s getting now because her
critics provide it, even if theirs is the negative sort. I disagree. If you
think that phenomenon will not influence how the Democratic Party picks its
nominees in 2026 and 2028, get ready to be surprised.
No comments:
Post a Comment