By Jeffrey Blehar
Tuesday, September 02, 2025
The last year has, I confess, been quite the education. A
miseducation, perhaps, for I have learned nothing good. I have become (more)
cynical with the quality of political media coverage and discourse. My true
“Dark Enlightenment” came from being tasked with writing constantly about
matters such as Joe Biden’s public meltdown, the fantasy-vibed Kamala Harris
2024 campaign, the Trump renascence, and our current blitzkrieg administration
— and seeing how various media outlets and figures comported themselves during this period. To say that the
liberal mainstream media forfeited its credibility during this era is, at this
point, almost a stale commonplace; the only question is whether that
credibility will ever be regained. (My guess: Betteridge’s Law applies here.)
It wasn’t just the “mainstream” media, or progressive
outlets, that I was paying attention to. The print-centered places and even
cable are no longer where the “action” is when it comes to the most pronounced
hackery — it’s on social media instead. Because with the age of the
social-media influencer, and with hundreds of millions of dollars in dark money
floating around behind the scenes, Twitter/X has now almost completed its
metamorphosis into a mindless propaganda hive mind, whose trends are often driven
by cliques of networked “influencers” working from pre-arranged talking points.
Nothing feels entirely real anymore, including the topics that “trend” and/or
we are jostled into writing about. (Sydney Sweeney was an organic media
obsession, because even journalists love gabbing about buxom starlets; Cracker
Barrel was not.)
It is the unceasing gush of it all that ages a man
prematurely. You readers, perforce, have a different relationship to the news
than I do. You are allowed to look away. I used to be able to as well!
Now I cannot, and the relentless, seemingly accelerating onslaught of both news
and “news” in the New Trump Era has required us all as commentators to refine a
set of skills: the ability to determine what does and does not matter in our
glutted media environment. There is so much noise out there in the political
media world nowadays, and very little true signal. The real task is to stay
connected to that signal, to what matters, and to keep transmitting it to you through
the wire.
Something Wicked This Way Comes
Speaking of things I wish I were allowed to look away
from, I did not want to write about the shooting in Minneapolis last week. I
still don’t want to address the specifics in any way, if for no other reason
than that I believe that the sorts of people who commit these acts dream of
laments like that being written — the promise of infamy. Aside from that, the
horror is also beyond my power to describe, and I’m not sure what value would
come of such an exercise in any event. There is simultaneously everything to
say about it, and little at all to add.
For example, there is less to say about the killer’s
specific motivations than most think. I’ve seen the “manifesto video.” I’ve
read the translations of the killer’s inarticulate, self-contradictory
journals. They are the cruel visions of a madman, little more. There is no
explanation to be found there, only the pathetically warped rationalizations
and half-logic of the deranged.
I can really only offer this: The starting point here is
mental illness. But the ending point is the online sump into which mental
illness now collects itself, like a malarial pool, cross-fertilizing into ever
more virulent strains of social disease. Our modern world is breeding
nihilistic evil, even as it lets age-old demons loose. The killer’s (apparently
semi-renounced) transgender identity is relevant, but only as a symptom of
a much broader, and darker, underlying problem facing America.
Others are less philosophical about such things, however,
and just couldn’t help themselves. So I’ll chime in only to point out what a
malevolent ghoul the Democratic Party’s self-appointed national mascot Gavin
Newsom has become in his pursuit of the spotlight. Newsom let it be known a
week or so ago that he had actually hired a spicy young social-media
whippersnapper to write and post his recent Twitter/X material. And I had to
laugh, because it was a transparent attempt to disclaim personal responsibility
for his account’s contents, disguised as “sharing the credit.”
Perhaps he was trying to get ahead of the game. Because
last week, in response to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
defending the value of prayer as a reaction to the atrocity, Gavin Newsom (or
“Gavin Newsom”) felt compelled to respond on Twitter by mocking
the idea of prayer itself as utterly worthless: “These children were
literally praying as they got shot at.” (Left implied: “Fat lot of good it did
them, or will do you.”)
I now understand why the staffer who purportedly writes
Gavin’s tweets is paid for her work: She captures his “voice” with such eerie
perfection. Because that right there is the true Gavin Newsom, his
spirit in one rotten sentence. The callow glibness, the contemptuously
dismissive tone, the clangingly materialist hollowness: Either Newsom wrote
that tweet himself (and I suspect he did), or this lady deserves a raise for
being an incredibly gifted impersonator.
Newsom, of course, is chasing controversy, and what
disgusts me the most is that he may be onto something, however cynical his
calculus. He has a sufficient left-wing base already prepared to back him on
this specific case for the simple reason that it beats having a long and
unpleasant discussion about the nexus between transgenderism and mental
illness. And all the while, as this mindless political thrum carries on in the
background, my thoughts instead turn to even darker quarters, those more
indebted to W. B. Yeats than Gavin Newsom.
I fear we are on the verge of a great societal breakdown
— one right out of the late Sixties and early Seventies — and we are not
prepared for it. Something wicked this way comes. The atrocity in Minneapolis
is but one articulated edge in a far larger fractal pattern of violence and
madness creeping across our landscape. Once the progress was imperceptibly
slow, but technology has proven to be the accelerant. The threat is
pre-political, generational, and perhaps even civilizational. The worst are
full of passionate intensity. Things are falling apart, crumbling at both the
margins and the center of our societal self-conception.
What comes next? I suppose we’ll find out.
No comments:
Post a Comment