By Noah Rothman
Tuesday, September 02, 2025
On paper, Maine Democrat Graham Platner is the answer to
all that ails his party.
His gruff demeanor and everyman vestiary convey easy and
authentic masculinity — a plus in a party that has struggled with that and is shedding male voters as a
result. He’s an oyster farmer and a Marine Corps veteran, which could help
court the working-class voters who have abandoned the Democrats in the Trump
years. And with his pledge not to support Chuck Schumer’s Senate leadership and the liberty
with which he criticizes Democrats as well as Republicans, he’s sufficiently
anti-establishment in a populist age. It’s no wonder he’s already raised a boatload of cash in his bid to unseat Republican
Senator Susan Collins in the fall.
Beyond the aesthetic trappings that thrill the Democratic
consultant class, however, Platner also clearly wants to be recognized for his
bravery. He postures as a dauntless truth-teller, one of the few willing to
name the forces of domestic subversion standing in the way of progress. “I am
not afraid to name the enemy,” Platner
said to a packed auditorium over the weekend while campaigning alongside
self-described socialist Senator Bernie Sanders. “The enemy is the oligarchy.”
The crowd jumped to its feet, apparently awed by the
display of raw gumption. It’s not at all clear why. The aspiring senator
managed just enough courage to align himself against an imagined cohort of
people with which no one identifies. Who are the self-described oligarchs among
us? Are they right now circling the wagons around their oligarchical frameworks
in which the rest of us are imprisoned? Is there a single person in America who
knows Platner was talking about him? Probably not.
Demonizing the nebulous abstraction “oligarchy” has
become part of the candidate’s shtick. In his introductory campaign video, he got into a little
bit more detail about who he believes represents the domestic “enemy” inside
America: the “oligarchy,” sure, but also the “billionaires” and the “corrupt
politicians.” It’s also “the system,” which is “screwing” the broader public.
The “system” is “failing.” It “doesn’t represent” the American majority, and,
indeed, “was never made for them.”
If we’re going to call this sort of thing brave, we’re
going to have to extend that status to every angsty teenager who believes she
is similarly beset by ill-defined forces, all conspiring to thwart her
ambitions for reasons as nefarious as they are vague.
This sort of talk is, however, what draws the paying
progressive crowds these days. By joining Sanders’s side and adopting his
hostility toward the amorphous oligarchs in our midst, Platner is mimicking the
act Congress’s socialists put on with their “Fight Oligarchy” roadshow. This past spring, Sanders joined
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on a whirlwind tour of some of America’s most affluent
municipalities — college campus towns and dark-blue urban enclaves — in which
everyone lamented their deprivation at the hands of the wealthy and powerful.
The events had the feel of a “religious revival,” the New York Post’s Kirsten Fleming observed. It was “their chance to be in
communion with like-minded people.” In fact, it had the feel of “a Trump rally
— only with different heroes and villains.” But while their heroes are
specific, the villains, save Donald Trump himself, are rarely so well-defined.
Given the scope of this malign intrigue and the breadth
of the cabal orchestrating it, it shouldn’t be too hard to name some names.
Indeed, doing so would expose the noble accusers to retaliation – a real threat
given the omnipotence of progressivism’s enemies. Even if the confederacy that
they’re railing against exists only in their own heads, we could grant them
credit for slaying the dragons that are at least real to them.
By keeping everything imprecise, the left would claim
credit for taking the powerful to task without exposing themselves to reprisals
— or exposing the non-existence of this bugbear when no reprisals materialize.
We can call that sort of tactic a lot of things, but brave is not one of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment