By Noah Rothman
Wednesday, August 06, 2025
In May of this year, long after he had passed on every
opportunity to correct whatever misapprehensions he internalized about Israel’s
pager operation against Hezbollah operatives, New York City
mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani demonstrated his commitment to his preferred
falsehoods.
During a meeting with Muslim constituents, Mamdani
reflected on “Israel’s blowing up of thousands of pagers across Lebanon,”
thus “killing scores of Lebanese civilians, including a young girl by the name
of Fatima, who picked up her father’s pager in an act of love and lost her
life.” The reflection was prompted by his recollection of a meeting similar to
the one in which he was participating — a gathering of Muslims in the city in
which pagers were not allowed as a paranoid precautionary measure. “We know
that to be Muslim in public life in this city, and this country, is to face
these kinds of responses,” Mamdani continued, “to be called a terrorist, no
matter where it is, where you go.”
“Scores” of civilians did not die in Israel’s pager
attack. Indeed, not even a single “score’s” worth of noncombatants perished. Of
the grand total of 42 deaths that resulted from one of the most discriminating
military operations in modern history, twelve were civilians. Most of the
Hezbollah terrorist operatives in possession of the pagers — and they were all
terrorist operatives, insofar as the rigged devices were military
communications equipment provided to individual fighters by their superiors —
were wounded in the attack. Just 1 percent of the pager explosions killed anyone, and only
0.4 percent of the detonations killed civilians.
There were, of course, tragic stories, like Fatima
Abdallah Jaafar’s. Tragedies happen in war, and aggressors who shield
themselves with civilians invite more than their fair share. Hezbollah, a State
Department–designated terrorist group with American blood on its hands, eagerly
joined in Hamas’s indiscriminate attacks on Israeli civilian population centers
shortly after the October 7 massacre. It executed those attacks all but
unmolested for nearly a year, all while these rigged pagers were deployed and ready
to go, until the summer of 2024. Only then did Israel debilitate thousands of
Hezbollah fighters by targeting their pagers and walkie-talkies and executing
pinpoint penetrating strikes on its leadership in buried bunkers. When the
prospect of widespread carnage was at its lowest, the Israel Defense Forces
entered southern Lebanon with the aim of clearing Hezbollah from Israel’s
northern borders — borders that had been largely evacuated since 10/7 under a
constant rain of rocket and mortar fire.
Inverting the roles of victim and victimizer here compels
those who are doing the inversion to engage in so much elision that the act is
indistinguishable from lying. The sins of omission compound to the point at
which reasonable observers are obliged to conclude that they’re being sold a
bill of goods. We know why Mamdani is engaged in this sordid campaign. His goal
is to popularize the anti-Israel narratives to which he is partial, which he
presumes will make his policy preferences — engineering a schism between the
U.S. and Jerusalem, among them — more feasible.
Since the Associated Press has now engaged in the same
elision and moral inversion of which Mamdani is guilty, we can conclude that
the AP shares his policy objectives.
With Mamdani-like indifference, the AP published a hand-wringing exposé about the suffering that Israel
inflicted on Hezbollah and the souls caught in its orbit. “Human rights and
United Nations reports, however, say the attack may have violated international
law, calling it indiscriminate,” the AP noted — a claim that says far more
about the observational capabilities, or lack thereof, of the U.N. and “human
rights” groups. Ten months later, the “survivors,” which the AP acknowledges
are “likely” Hezbollah members or the “dependents” of terrorist operatives,
“are on a slow, painful path to recovery.”
The reporters who interviewed “Hezbollah officials or
fighters or members of their families” noted that they had all “lost fingers,”
had shrapnel “lodged under their skin,” were blinded, or had lost an eye. A
handful were civilians — collateral damage resulting from their proximity to
known terrorist operatives. The vast majority of the wounded were affiliated
with the Iran-backed terrorist group illegally occupying Lebanon.
The sprawling profile is replete with what the reader
must assume are supposed to be sob stories. Take, for example, 23-year-old
Mahdi Sheri’s harrowing experience. A “Hezbollah fighter,” he “had been ordered
back to the frontline on the day of the attack.” The pager went off as he
looked at it, leaving him blinded in one eye. “He can no longer play football,”
the AP mourns. “Hezbollah is helping him find a new job. Sheri realizes it’s
impossible now to find a role alongside Hezbollah fighters.”
That’s not a story of woe. It’s a report on a Hezbollah
terrorist who was taken off the battlefield — advancing Israel’s security
objectives — who nevertheless lived to tell the tale. Even the AP’s effort to
present the minors who were wounded in the Israeli operation as sympathetic
victims exposes Hezbollah’s moral culpability. Twelve-year-old Hussein Dheini,
whose face was disfigured in one of the explosions, now struggles to read and
regulate his breathing. But he is only in that position because he served in
Hezbollah’s “youth movement” — the so-called “scouts,” in which young children
are taught antisemitic conspiracy theories and trained to
engage in terroristic direct action, like mass shootings and suicide bombings. The boy’s father owned
the pager that permanently injured him, but he was not insulated from
Hezbollah’s terrorism. He was being actively groomed for future terrorist
activity.
These are examples in microcosm of why the pager
operation was a spectacularly successful, and spectacularly moral, enterprise.
Israel didn’t have to invest untold resources and years
of spy craft into the effort to establish dummy corporations that would sell
Hezbollah the instruments of its own destruction. It could have relied on
conventional military assets to deter Iran’s terrorist proxies and slaughter
them wholesale when deterrence broke down. Israel has had to be cleverer than
that — mostly for the benefit of Western audiences, who, as the AP illustrates,
do not care in the slightest that the tactics in which Israel engages are not
comparable to those of the terrorists with whom it is at war.
No comments:
Post a Comment