By Tim Chapman
Sunday, December 14, 2025
New York City’s socialist Mayor-elect Zohran
Mamdani walked into a Queens bodega recently and stumbled his way into
Milton Friedman–style conservativism. This sentence would shock most people,
but it happened. In one of his latest small-business campaign videos,
the world’s newest socialist darling unintentionally promoted beating back
burdensome government through deregulation.
Mugged by the reality of running a bodega, Mamdani now
wants to cut fines and fees by 50 percent, expedite permitting, and cut the
bureaucratic red tape that slows new businesses from opening their doors.
Blissfully unaware, he lamented: “You shouldn’t have to fill out 24 forms and
go through seven agencies to start a barbershop.” Then, he channeled his inner
Elon Musk and announced a new “mom-and-pop czar” who will coordinate city
agencies to improve turnaround times and help businesses navigate the cumbersome
regulatory system. A little New York City DOGE?
This is a surprising rhetorical change for someone who
campaigned on a full-scale socialist takeover of the world’s financial capital.
Throughout the race, Mamdani argued that more government would make New York
more affordable. His Election Night declaration that “there is no problem too
large for government to solve” made it clear for all.
Yet only weeks before officially being sworn in — and
confronted with the daunting realities of governing a complex economy — he
unwittingly conceded that rather than solve “large problems,” big government’s
numerous rules and regulations actually drive up costs and make life
unaffordable.
Mamdani’s sudden embrace of deregulation, however, should
not be mistaken for a broader change of heart. Nothing else in his agenda
suggests one.
Mamdani is still the same man who campaigned, and won, on
Communist Manifesto–inspired policies that would smother any remaining
chance of economic revival in New York and, in turn, make the city even more
expensive. Let’s not forget that he endorsed “seizing the means of production” and promised rent freezes
and government-run grocery stores and child care and free public transport,
then proposed race-based tax hikes on “richer and whiter neighborhoods” to pay for it all.
These proposals are the core of his platform. And they
rest on the same flawed assumption that has guided socialist command economics
for a century: that affordability is created when government consolidates more
control. In fact, the opposite is true.
Mamdani’s bodega deregulation moment shines a light on
his silver-spoon socialist ignorance. It is his proposed policies and that very
ideology that create bureaucratic encumbrances and make everything more
expensive. The same red tape that Mamdani now concedes is suffocating bodegas
is driving up the price of almost everything New Yorkers buy, build, or try to
open.
New York City has some of the most complex and lengthy
permitting timelines of any major city, a barrier that continues to worsen its
housing shortage and undermine business competitiveness. The city is also known
for its “complex regulatory environment,” with more than 6,000 rules
and roughly 250 business-related licenses and permits, each accompanied by its
own compliance process. New York City is still missing 30,000 small-business
jobs that never came back after Governor Andrew Cuomo’s disastrous mismanagement
during the Covid-19 pandemic. Today, NYC’s overall cost of living is 130 percent above the national average.
Working families live in this reality every day through
higher grocery bills, higher rent, and fewer neighborhood stores. Investors and
entrepreneurs are jetting off to states such as Florida and Texas because taxes
are too high, compliance is too expensive, and the regulatory environment is
nearly impossible to navigate. Why bother?
The cost of living in NYC keeps climbing because the cost
of doing business has been ratcheted up to the moon by a city government that
inserts itself into nearly every step of the economic process.
New York is not expensive because the private sector is
failing. It is expensive because the private sector is handcuffed to a New York
City bureaucrat at every turn.
Small government has always offered the opposite. Fewer,
consistently applied rules give businesses the ability to plan, invest, and
open their doors without procedural bottlenecks. Lower taxes keep capital
circulating in neighborhoods rather than siphoning it off into the government’s
treasury. A restrained regulatory posture gives today’s entrepreneurs the
freedom to solve the problems of today without the bureaucrats of the past
holding them back. These are the basic economic realities that make goods affordable,
support job creation, and keep cities livable.
Mamdani’s bodega epiphany points toward this reality,
even if unintentionally. His interest in reducing fines, accelerating
permitting, and simplifying basic processes is an acknowledgment that
government restraint is not an ideological preference but a prerequisite for
affordability.
If Mamdani extended this logic beyond bodegas, he might
actually deliver the affordability he campaigned on. He has already taken one
small step. The city would benefit from several more.
No comments:
Post a Comment