By Bruce Hoffman
Monday, June 02, 2025
Terrorism doesn’t occur in a vacuum. It depends on the
oxygen of rhetoric for sustenance and encouragement. Nearly two years after Hamas
attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, the cumulative
effect of calls to “Globalize the intifada” and “End Zionists” perhaps
inevitably led to the horrific
attack yesterday in Boulder, Colorado, where a man
yelled “Free Palestine” as he threw an incendiary device at a Jewish gathering
in support of the hostages.
Words matter. The protester at Columbia University in
2024 holding a
sign labeling Jewish demonstrators who were waving
Israeli flags as Al-Qasam’s
next targets was dismissed as being hyperbolic. So were the By Any Means Necessary banners carried
at demonstrations and the red inverted triangles, similar to those Hamas uses
to mark Israeli targets, spray-painted on university buildings, a national
monument, and even the apartment
building of a museum director. When demonstrators wave
the flags of terrorist organizations, wear headbands celebrating those same
groups, and publicly commemorate the martyrdom of terrorist leaders such as
Hamas’s Yahya
Sinwar and Hezbollah’s Hassan
Nasrallah, they’re not throwing the bomb, but their message can light the
fuse.
In the past six weeks, that fuse has produced a
succession of terrorist acts that have threatened the safety
and security of America’s
Jewish community. That two of the incidents also occurred on Jewish
holidays—the arson
attack on Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s
official residence on the first night of Passover and yesterday’s incident in
Boulder on the eve of Shavuot—show that Jews in America are not only in some
danger, but even more likely to be targeted on specific dates marking religious
ritual and observance.
And they won’t be just singled out, but subjected to
especially heinous acts of violence. The attacker in Boulder used a homemade
flamethrower and Molotov cocktails, resulting in eight people being hospitalized with burns and other injuries. Tragically, among the eight
victims, who ranged in age from 52 to 88, the eldest was reportedly a Holocaust
survivor.
Yet another example of an especially egregious act of
violence was the shooting deaths last month of Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah
Milgrim on the street outside a Jewish museum in Washington, D.C. One bullet
from a powerful 9-mm handgun is often sufficient to kill. But police found 21
shell casings scattered around the two bodies. The
murderer allegedly stalked Milgrim as she attempted to crawl away, shooting her repeatedly. This was an execution.
For years, American Jews watched with horror the attacks
on their European co-religionists. A young man kidnapped and tortured to death, an elderly lady beaten and thrown out the window of her home, and a teacher and three
children murdered outside a Jewish day school are among a long list of violent
anti-Semitic incidents in France alone—the country with the world’s
third-largest population of Jews after Israel and the United States.
“What history had taught him was Amazement,” Lion
Feuchtwanger writes of the conclusion reached by one of the characters in his
deeply prescient 1933 novel about Nazi Germany, The Oppermanns. “A
tremendous amazement that each time those in jeopardy had been so slow in
thinking about their safety.” Despite the sharp
increase in the number of anti-Semitic incidents in
the U.S. recorded over the past decade by the Anti-Defamation League, American
Jews also once believed that the violence against Jews in France, Britain,
Germany, and other European countries couldn’t happen here. Many told
themselves that this threat was unique to European Jewry, given the internal
frictions within their own countries, which had absorbed large immigrant
populations from former colonial possessions. But yesterday’s attack, coming on
the heels of the firebombing of Shapiro’s residence and the D.C. murders, has
proved otherwise. As Ian Fleming, the former spy and novelist who created James
Bond, reportedly observed, “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three
times is enemy action.”
Arguably the system was already blinking red after the
2018 mass
shooting at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue, where
a gunman killed 11 people, and the near tragedy averted four years later, when
an armed man took
hostage the rabbi and worshippers at a Colleyville,
Texas, synagogue. The October 7 attacks heightened that awareness and led Jews
to emulate the security measures standard at synagogues, day schools, community
centers, and senior residences in Europe. Private companies were hired to
provide guards at the entrances to synagogues and schools. Volunteers were
solicited, trained, and deployed by community-based security organizations. The
positioning of at least one local police car and patrol officer in front of synagogues
became commonplace.
But in today’s threat environment, the question for Jews
everywhere is inevitably: How much security is enough?
Shapiro’s residence was not unprotected. Additional armed
guards were deployed at the entrance to the Jewish museum for the event that
Lischinsky and Milgrim attended. Jewish institutions, organizations, and
agencies, moreover, are already burdened with rising security costs. A study of expenditures at Jewish day schools in four states found that
the average cost for security had nearly doubled in 2024–25—to
$339,000—compared with 2022–23. After the past six weeks, further increases can
be expected. The same is true on university campuses across America, where
Jewish- or Israeli-studies departments and centers, as well as similarly
oriented student organizations and Jewish ministries, are themselves
responsible for paying for the security now standard for all of their events.
And there will be challenges in what can be done to
prevent such tragedies in the future. For instance, although security was
increased at the entrance to and inside the D.C. Jewish museum, Lischinsky and
Milgrim were gunned down outside, on a street corner. Will security measures
now require that a secure perimeter be established, or even concentric circles
of security in front of every venue and surrounding any event? Will a phalanx
of local police or community volunteers be required to box in and protect
participants at any and every Jewish event? After yesterday’s attack in
Boulder, the answer, most likely, is yes.
Security provisions are often likened to the proverbial
length of a ball of string. In the case of American Jewry, however long that
once was, it now needs to be lengthened. Whatever upgrades and increases have
been implemented in the past will necessitate reassessment, further
modification, and enhancements. More resources will need to be dedicated to
ensure the protection of Jewish places of worship, clerics, and congregations.
The same is true for other Jewish and Israel-related activities at schools, community
centers, offices, and senior homes. The same goes for marches, parades,
demonstrations, vigils, and other inherently public events. Strengthened
physical, personal, and digital security measures will likely follow—especially
during religious holidays and festivals. Even greater cooperation,
coordination, and information sharing between law enforcement and Jewish
institutions than already exists will be needed.
Ultimately, however, physical security alone will not
protect American Jewry. The prejudice and calumny directed against that
community that have now become commonplace and have often been treated with
indifference must change as well. And with this must come the recognition that
violence threatens not just American Jews but all Americans. The Council on
American-Islamic Relations cites record numbers of anti-Muslim and anti-Arab incidents;
CatholicVote finds hundreds of instances of vandalism as well as more serious
attacks on Catholic churches in the U.S. since 2020; and the Hindu American
Foundation had to issue a “Temple Safety & Security Guide” to its worshippers.
Violence against all faiths is rising. To stop it, our
society must take more seriously not just bomb throwing, but the messages that
light the fuse.
No comments:
Post a Comment