Monday, May 12, 2025

Beware of Foreign Powers Bearing Gifts

By Jim Geraghty

Monday, May 12, 2025

 

The United States is cutting its defense budget (once you adjust for inflation) and eliminating 50,000 to 60,000 civilian jobs in the Defense Department, downsizing our intelligence community, and attempting to drastically cut Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Free Asia — our endeavors to send the truth, our message and worldview out across the globe. We’ve apparently decided that all these efforts, which are designed to increase our power and influence in the world, just aren’t worth the expenditure anymore. Meanwhile, China is increasing its defense budget by 7 percent, Russia is increasing its defense budget by 40 percent (!), and Iran is increasing its defense budget by 200 percent (!!).

 

Why do foreigners make generous gifts to American universities? Because they’ve decided the benefit is worth the cost. Why would foreigners want to give a lot of money to an institution associated with a former, current, or future president? Because they’ve decided the benefit is worth the cost. Read on, all the way to the end.

 

It is great that President Trump is requiring higher education and research institutions to provide full and timely disclosure of foreign funding.

 

This past week, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of the General Counsel accused the University of Pennsylvania of filing “incomplete, inaccurate, and untimely disclosures” “in possible violation of foreign source funding statutory disclosure obligations”:

 

UPenn failed to disclose any foreign financial funding until February 2019 – brazenly ignoring the statutory disclosure requirement enacted in 1986 to which other prominent, well-funded universities had engaged in compliance efforts.

 

Once it began submitting statutorily required foreign funding information in 2019, UPenn disclosed 2,042 qualifying financial transactions involving foreign sources, revealing extremely high levels of foreign funding. According to UPenn’s disclosure reports, foreign gifts and contracts received by UPenn through 2017 were valued at approximately $358 million dollars. After the establishment of the Penn-Biden Center in 2018 , foreign financial influence grew dramatically, totaling approximately $2.3 billion by 2025— a 542 percent increase in reportable foreign funding since 2018.

 

In a released statement, acting DoE general counsel Tom Wheeler said:

 

OGC will investigate this matter thoroughly, ensuring that universities cannot conceal the infiltration of our nation’s campuses by foreign governments and other foreign interests. The American people and Congress have a right to know the impact of foreign funding on our universities, including some of our critically important research universities. We hope the University of Pennsylvania will be cooperative and forthcoming in response to this investigation.

 

You may recall that during the controversy of elected officials taking classified documents home with them, some Biden critics contended the sudden increase in foreign donations to the University of Pennsylvania after the creation of the Penn Biden Center was a backdoor way of buying access to the former vice president and future president.

 

The America First Legal Foundation filed an IRS complaint, contending that the Penn Biden Center “functioned as a vehicle for Penn to raise and funnel large amounts of Chinese Communist money to Joe Biden and his political cronies.” Shockingly, the IRS did not jump right on that request to investigate the president and his closest allies. But FOIA requests filed by the America First Legal Foundation found that Jay Bratt, a prosecutor in the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Security Division, aggressively pursued the Mar-a-Lago case but had a much softer and less confrontational approach to the classified documents found at the Penn Biden Center.

 

The Penn Biden Center hasn’t posted on Facebook since 2021 or posted on X since 2022. in June 2024, the University of Pennsylvania announced the creation of “Penn Washington, a new program with a physical hub for the University in Washington, D.C.” with the Penn Biden Center folded into that larger organization. The current faculty adviser for Penn Washington is Ezekiel J. Emanuel, brother of Rahm Emanuel, and a former member of President Biden’s Covid-19 advisory board. (You may recall Emanuel was an architect of Obamacare who — after it was passed, mind you — contended it would, by design, lead to the end of private health insurance. Also, Ezekiel Emanuel wants to die at age 75 and argues that life after age 75 is not worth living. He turns 68 in September. Tick, tick, tick. . . .)

 

Back in January 2023, House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer, a Kentucky Republican, contended that the Penn Biden Center was a “foreign-sponsored source of income for much of a Biden Administration in-waiting.”

 

“The Penn Biden Center appears to have acted as a foreign-sponsored source of income for much of a Biden Administration in-waiting,” Comer said. “Between 2017 and 2019, UPenn paid President Biden more than $900,000, and the university employed at least 10 people at the Penn Biden Center who later became senior Biden administration officials,” Comer said. “This level of access and opportunity raises questions about who had access to the classified documents found at the Penn Biden Center.”

 

We all agree that backdoor payments and cash contribution to the president and his family are bad, right?

 

Right?

 

Because while we’re at it . . .

 

. . . the president of the United States should not be accepting a “new Air Force One” from the government of Qatar:

 

In what may be the most valuable gift ever extended to the United States from a foreign government, the Trump administration is preparing to accept a super luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet from the royal family of Qatar — a gift that is to be available for use by President Donald Trump as the new Air Force One until shortly before he leaves office, at which time ownership of the plane will be transferred to the Trump presidential library foundation, sources familiar with the proposed arrangement told ABC News.

 

The gift is expected to be announced next week, when Trump visits Qatar on the first foreign trip of his second term, according to sources familiar with the plans.

 

Trump toured the plane, which is so opulently configured it is known as “a flying palace,” while it was parked at the West Palm Beach International Airport in February.

 

ABC News reports, “The highly unusual — unprecedented — arrangement is sure to raise questions about whether it is legal for the Trump administration, and ultimately, the Trump presidential library foundation, to accept such a valuable gift from a foreign power.”

 

Ya think? The American public is just now hearing about it, but it sounds like it’s more than halfway to being a done deal. The Wall Street Journal, May 1:

 

The U.S. government has commissioned L3Harris to overhaul a Boeing 747 formerly used by the Qatari government. The Melbourne, Fla.-based company is tasked with retrofitting the plane with certain specialized systems to transform the luxury aircraft into a presidential jet, some of the people said.

 

Trump wants to have the plane available for use as early as the fall, some of the people said. He has regularly asked for updates.

 

I don’t care if Boeing is completing the next Air Force One at the speed of George R. R. Martin writing the next Game of Thrones novel; the president cannot accept a plane that he will fly on during his presidency from a foreign power, particularly not one described as “one of the world’s foremost proponents of violent Islamist movements and states.”

 

ABC News adds:

 

Sources told ABC News that Attorney General Pam Bondi and Trump’s top White House lawyer David Warrington concluded it would be “legally permissible” for the donation of the aircraft to be conditioned on transferring its ownership to Trump’s presidential library before the end of his term, according to sources familiar with their determination.

 

The sources said Bondi provided a legal memorandum addressed to the White House counsel’s office last week after Warrington asked her for advice on the legality of the Pentagon accepting such a donation.

 

Hey, you know what Bondi did before she came Trump’s (second) nominee to be attorney general? She was a registered lobbyist for the government of Qatar, making $115,000 per month, according to her forms required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act. (On her first day in office as attorney general, Bondi announced the DOJ would only pursue criminal charges for FARA violations in “instances of alleged conduct similar to more traditional espionage by foreign government actors.”

 

So a former highly paid lobbyist for Qatar says she sees no ethical problem with the president she works for accepting a $400 million plane from the government of Qatar.

 

(Hey, who pays the tariffs on the import of that plane?)

 

Dear congressional Republicans: Sometimes the president needs you to step in to save him from himself.

 

While we’re at it, the president of the United States should not be selling meme coins or other cryptocurrency while his administration is crafting federal rules for the regulation of that currency.

 

Our Andy McCarthy:

 

[According to a report] an entity controlled by a foreign regime, the United Arab Emirates, would buy $2 billion of the Trump family’s new “stablecoin” (a digital currency whose producers function, and generate income, like a bank) to consummate an investment in Binance — a crypto exchange. And not just any crypto exchange: Binance is under U.S. government monitoring because of its criminal violations of federal money-laundering laws. In 2023, Binance’s founder and now Trump business partner, Changpeng Zhao, a Chinese-born Canadian billionaire, pled guilty to a felony money-laundering charge that landed him in prison for four months. He is said to be lobbying the president for a pardon.

 

More details:

 

Zach Witkoff, a founder of the Trump family crypto firm, World Liberty Financial, revealed that a so-called stablecoin developed by the firm would be used to complete the transaction between the state-backed Emirati investment firm MGX and Binance, the largest crypto exchange in the world.

 

Virtually every detail of Mr. Witkoff’s announcement, made during a conference panel with Mr. Trump’s second-eldest son, contained a conflict of interest.

 

MGX’s use of the World Liberty stablecoin, USD1, brings a Trump family company into business with a venture firm backed by a foreign government. The deal creates a formal link between World Liberty and Binance — a company that has been under U.S. government oversight since 2023, when it admitted to violating federal money-laundering laws.

 

And the splashy announcement served as an advertisement to crypto investors worldwide about the potential for forming a partnership with a company tied to President Trump, who is listed as World Liberty’s chief crypto advocate.

 

If the name “Witkoff” triggered your Spidey-sense, it’s because Zach Witkoff is the son of the White House envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff. You know, the top negotiator who said Hamas duped him and that he doesn’t consider Vladimir Putin a bad guy.

 

Remember, people buy cryptocurrency and meme coins with real money. I know this is going to shock you, but it turns out that the purchase of Trump’s meme coins have not turned out well for those who bought them:

 

A memecoin is a type of crypto token with no inherent value, often based, as the name suggests, on a meme or cartoon character. Popular examples of this are dogecoin (DOGE), shiba inu (SHIB) and pepe (PEPE). The craze reached a climax in January when Trump touted his own TRUMP token on social media, followed by MELANIA— named after his wife.

 

TRUMP, which hit a day-one peak of $77.26, is now trading at $10.80, down a whopping 86%. MELANIA slumped even further, losing more than 97 percent of its value in four months to trade recently at 33 cents. . . .

 

The token’s creators netted a whopping $320 million in trading fees, although it’s worth noting that around 5 percent of the fees went to the decentralized exchange Meteora, which hosted the launch.

 

The good news is that the evidence suggests it is gullible foreign investors who are losing their shirts on Trump’s meme coins. The bad news is this means lots of foreigners are putting money in the pockets of the U.S. president:

 

More than half of the top holders of President Donald Trump’s memecoin — who are jockeying for dinner with the president — have used foreign exchanges that say they ban US users, suggesting that many of the purchasers are based outside the US.

 

An analysis by Bloomberg News shows that all but six of the top 25 holders who have registered on the website’s leaderboard used foreign exchanges that say they exclude customers living in the US. More broadly, at least 56 percent of the leaderboard’s top 220 holders used similar offshore exchanges.

 

Speaking of cryptocurrency, while there’s no problem with the U.S. government having a cryptocurrency reserve consisting of cryptocurrency that was seized from criminals, there is no need for the U.S. to spend a dime purchasing any additional cryptocurrency. And the U.S. government should sell whatever cryptocurrency it owns whenever it wants. At the White House “crypto summit,” Michael Saylor, the former longtime CEO of MicroStrategy, and a major investor in Bitcoin, proposed that the U.S. government buy more Bitcoin, every day for the next decade — maintaining consistent demand, which would discourage price drops, and likely encourage price increases — and then never sell it. The upside for Saylor is clear; how this benefits the rest of us is less clear.

 

They call it “crypt-ocurrency” because if you put your life’s savings into it, your financial future is dead and buried.

 

Trump also never disclosed who funded the presidential transition effort. The Trump inaugural committee did disclose its donors, as required by law:

 

The three largest contributions came from a poultry producer, Pilgrim’s, which donated $5 million; a crypto company, Ripple Inc., which donated just under that; and Warren Stephens, a Republican donor who gave $4 million on the same day, Dec. 2, that Mr. Trump named him as his pick to be ambassador to Britain.

 

The committee raised $239 million in total. If that seems like a lot, it’s because it is:

 

Inaugurations, even with several days of elaborate dinners and other events, have never cost anything near roughly a quarter-billion dollars, and the amount raised by the committee will resurface questions about where any leftover funds might go. The committee has not said how much money it has spent, but the president’s allies have said that the remaining amount will be funneled to other Trump-sponsored projects, primarily a nonprofit organization that will build his presidential library.

 

Sorry, MAGA fans, but the first half of this newsletter about the gobs of foreign money coming into the University of Pennsylvania was a lure to get you to read about all the shady stuff your guy’s doing.

 

An observation about the Biden and Trump families: They’re already rich. They already have palatial homes and fancy cars and fine suits and a comfortable financial cushion. If they never accepted a dime from any foreigner seeking influence, both families were already guaranteed to live out their days with more financial resources than probably 99 percent of all Americans.

 

But apparently, that just wasn’t enough for them.

 

Oh, and remember, your daughter is just going to have to get by with fewer dolls for the foreseeable future.

 

ADDENDUM: Credit to the Pew Research organization for attempting to figure out how many poll respondents “do not answer questions sincerely; instead, they attempt to complete surveys with as little effort as possible to earn money or other rewards.”

 

In February 2022, they asked, “Are you licensed to operate a class SSGN (nuclear) submarine?” The pollster found, “in the opt-in survey, 12 percent of adults under 30 claimed this qualification, significantly higher than the share among older respondents. In reality, the share of Americans with this type of submarine license rounds to 0 percent.”

No comments:

Post a Comment